The International Fencing Federation (FIE) also said it was reinstating Kharlan, allowing her to take part in the team competition at the world championships in Milan.

Emmanuel Katsiadakis, the Greek president of the FIE, said the decision had been taken “after consultation with the International Olympic Committee”.

Kharlan, the first fencer to face a Russian or Belarusian since the former’s invasion of Ukraine, won 15-7 against Russia’s Anna Smirnova on Thursday.

The 32-year-old four-time Olympic medallist refused Smirnova’s handshake afterwards, instead offering her sabre to tap blades, but FIE rules state that the two fencers must shake hands.

Smirnova staged a 45-minute protest and refused to leave the competition strip.

Kharlan was disqualified, claiming afterwards that Emmanuel Katsiadakis, the Greek president of the FIE, had even assured her that it was “possible” not to shake hands and offer a touch of her blade instead following her victory.

“I thought I had his word, to be safe, but apparently, no,” Kharlan said.

In response to her disqualification, the International Olympic Committee called for Ukrainian athletes to be treated “sensitively”.

Then on Friday, IOC President Thomas Bach, a former Olympic fencer himself, sent Kharlan a letter saying she would be guaranteed a place at next year’s Olympics in Paris regardless of whether she gained the qualification points.

  • lasagna@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Smirnova staged a 45-minute protest and refused to leave the competition strip.”

    The Russian fencer is basically a toddler.

    • prodigalsorcerer@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      To be clear, if she is contesting a ruling by the referee, she is not allowed to leave the piste (strip) until the situation is resolved by the head official(s). As soon as she leaves the piste, she gives up all rights to contest a ruling.

      This happened publicly before with Shin A-lam at the 2012 Olympics, where she had to stay on piste for an hour while the officials discussed the ruling.

      • lasagna@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        So to be clear, she is throwing a tantrum because the Ukrainian contestant didn’t want to shake hands with a citizen of the country that has been killing her people?

        • prodigalsorcerer@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes. I think this is less a tantrum, and more of a “fuck you” from Smirnova to Kharlan, but your interpretation is fine.

          The rules state that the competitors must shake hands at the end of a bout, and that the penalty for refusing to shake hands is a black card. At the beginning of the pandemic, this rule was suspended, and was replaced with saluting and tapping blades. It is not clear whether the handshake rule is back in effect at the international level (which in itself is a huge problem - if athletes can’t look up the rules, it’s hard to follow them).

          As an online observer, these are the facts I was able to gather. At the end of this bout, Kharlan offered her blade for the blade tap, and instead of reciprocating, Smirnova offered her hand for a handshake. Kharlan then left the piste without tapping blades or shaking hands, and Smirnova launched her complaint which (per the rules) required her to remain on piste until the issue was resolved. The officials decided the complaint was legitimate, and black carded Kharlan.

          All that follows is my own speculation. Kharlan offered the blade tap but was refused. Depending on whether the handshake rule is officially reinstated (and it seems that many athletes at this particular competition were just tapping blades without a handshake) she may have been able to lodge her own complaint that Smirnova was unwilling to tap blades. They could have just had an old fashioned stand-off, with one fencer extending their blade for the tap and the other extending their hand for the handshake, neither willing to compromise, and it would (probably) have resulted in the referee clarifying the rules without penalty to either fencer. But because Kharlan left the piste without tapping blades and without shaking hands, it left an opening for Smirnova to exploit.

          I do wish that the FIE would go on record saying whether the handshake rule is fully back in effect. I’m actually a fan of tapping blades, because too many fencers show up to tournaments sick, and shaking hands with everyone is a good way to spread disease. Even beyond that, people often have very sweaty hands, and it’s just kinda gross.

    • xuxebiko@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m surprised she didn’t declare that Kharlan’s medals belong to Russia.

      • Splitdipless@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m surprised Russia isn’t complaining that Ukraine, which they believe should be part of Russia, isn’t arguing Ukraine isn’t a country and shouldn’t compete.

  • Landrin201@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why should she be treated any differently than other athletes? She deliberately broke the rules, got a punishment, threw a fit overthe punishment, and now is getting a special place in the Olympics despite not qualifying for them? That seems kinda ridiculius IMO.

    • DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Being forced to shake hands with the representation of the people committing war crimes against your family and nation is an awful standard.

      “Okay, we know he raped you, but it’s been 17 months. Just get over it and shake his hand.”

      • Addfwyn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That comparison makes no sense at all. Her opponent didn’t assault her, nor is she responsible for the actions of any of the government involved. She’s an athlete, not a head of state. She wasn’t fencing against Putin.

        A more apt comparison would be to refuse to shake hands with anyone from France because you were assaulted by a French person once. You would be widely, and rightfully, decried as racist for such a position.

        • DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The rules are set up to present a ladylike/gentlemanly behavior in the face of good sportsmanship. There is nothing ungentlemanly or unladylike in refusing to shake hands when a sword tap will suffice.

          There is also nothing unladylike about not wanting to touch the person who represents your rapists. If the athlete representing Russia doesn’t like that treatment, they can choose to participate without representing a nation.

          There are simple solutions to all of these problems, but the most important aspect is she had an agreement with the official that a sword tap would be appropriate and acceptable beforehand. Downvotes mean nothing without a response. I can sign up for 10 accounts and manipulate the votes too!

        • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          The boyfriend of the russian fencer is currently in ukraine committing war crimes. She is a supporter of that genocide. Would you expect a jewish fencer during WW2 to shake hands with a fencer whose husband is in the SS?

      • hglman@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a deranged analogy. Being from a nation doesn’t place the crimes of the government on every citizen. More, the olymics exists to be a place to attempt to step outside conflict, as hard as that might be.

      • Landrin201@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        The athlete in question is not their government, cannot prevent their government from doing the war, and is not responsible for any of the crimes of her government. Changing the rules for one athlete because she doesn’t like her opponent is ridiculous. This rule has been on the book for decades. People from countries in much more bitter wars have shaken hands.

        And also the other fencer literally did not rape her, this situation isn’t even remotely comparable to what you just said. That’s an utterly ridiculous comparison. You’re making it out as though this one athlete is personally responsible for everything Russia has done in the last 2 years and should be treated as such.

        • DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That athlete represents the government in an official capacity at a world event. You’re making it out like they somehow don’t represent Russia.

          I can see by your downvote but failure to reply that you believe the athlete does not represent Russia. Then why have country distinctions at all?

        • MaggiWuerze@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          She competes for Russia, represents Russia at this event and thus has to live with meeting the same response as her country does

        • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s easy to say thousands of kilometers removed from the atrocities. There’s a high likelihood that someone from her family or friends was killed, raped, or deported by someone from that other athelete’s friends or family. Whether or not you agree with the IOC ruling, show some fucking compassion for the athlete.

          Furthermore let’s not ignore the fact that the Olympics have ALWAYS been politicized, and these things fucking matter. There are entire paragraphs on Jesse Owen’s wikipedia speculating on whether or not he shook Hitler’s hand, because Hitler snubbed the medal presentations because he was pissed that “coloured people” were winning.
          Even taking a completely cynical look at things, the optics are extremely important, and all of this, from both atheltes’ behavior to the IOC’s reactions, are ALL political statements to a degree or another, and everyone imvolved is a grown-ass adults who didn’t have to hide behind a rulebook if they didn’t want to.

        • DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Ahhh yes! The Wagner “coup” preceded by a military buildup on the Russian side! Didn’t something similar happen in Russia recently? If memory serves, the leader of both coups is still alive and still a person that even Putin can’t just kill off. What was his name? Yevgeny Prigozhin, you say? Tell us more about the coup!

          And now Ukraine is hitting downtown Moscow with drones. That coup?

          Edit: You see, the trolls don’t know how to respond when they’re not allowed to talk about a subject that could hurt the viewpoint of Russian/Chinese propaganda. Next up: labor death camps! How’s that diplomat from China that went missing? Is Navalny in good health?

            • DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              So what you’re saying is like: China annexes all of Russia, bombs the hell out of it, and then says “why won’t they just agree to stop fighting? We’re doing this for you! We raped your citizens and deported your children because your leaders are (ironically) Jewish Nazis!”

              Why should any sovereign nation give up land to invaders, especially when they’re in the middle of an offensive campaign? The US News is reporting Ukraine is about to start an offensive in Crimea, so why on earth would they stop to negotiate with a bully who is currently getting their asses charred?

              When you’re winning at LoL or Fortnite, do you suddenly go to your opponent and say “Hey man! We should stop fighting, and share this victory! I don’t like that I’m currently winning! Here’s half my inventory and points. Enjoy!”

              Your username kinda gives you away. You should consider using one of your alts

                • DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  What is Russia’s perspective? They invaded, and now they’re upset they could lose the land they stole in 2014. They wanted a warm water port. They got it. But then they wanted all of the farm land in Ukraine, so they invaded again. Now they have no hope of gaining the farmland, and they may never get full use of the warm water port in Crimea. There is zero chance the Ukrainian people stop harassing Crimea.

                  NATO expanded as a result of the 2014 invasion (2017, 2020, 2023), so that member nations can maintain their ancestral lands and have no fear of being invaded by… You guessed it: Russia

      • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It is really insensitive and anti-feminist to make rape comparisons because you can’t find less charged rhetoric to use. Most women experience sexual violence and something like 1/6 of of all women have ptsd on that account, it is very inconsiderate.

        • grue@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Considering how many Ukranian women and children are being literally raped by the Russian invaders, I’d say the comparison is plenty apt!

          Your concern trolling is the thing that’s insensitive and inconsiderate.

          • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            And that has to do with this one woman competitor how? Did she sign off on the invasion?

            No?

            Then don’t compare her being there to a rapist.