• FaceDeer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I was directly addressing all of the points you raised.

    You said it concentrates wealth, but open source does the opposite of that - it allows small companies and individuals to earn money using the technology without having to pay for its use.

    You said it “harms everyone but the 0.1%.” I am benefited by it, not harmed, and I am very much not part of the 0.1%.

    • TootSweet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      You’re hallucinating. (Pun intended.)

      Neither Capt. Wolf nor I said a single thing about AI or Open Source. And the article didn’t mention anything about Open Source.

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        No, I said things about AI and open source. I raised open source as part of my counter to your argument that this is “concentrating wealth.”

        Here, I’ll explain in detail what’s going on.

        In response to an article about Reddit licensing your content to AI trainers, capt_wolf said “it’s time to purge your account.” Presumably as a way to stop that from happening. I asked why that was a bad thing, specifically how it harmed us in any meaningful way. You came in at that point and suggested:

        • It’s a scheme to further concentrate wealth
        • It harms everyone but the 0.1%.

        I raised open source as a counter to the “wealth concentration” point, because open source does the opposite - it spreads the wealth to any who want it. It puts these resources into the commons.

        I also pointed out that I personally benefit from AI tools, so it does the opposite of harming me. As I am not part of the 0.1%, that’s a counter to your second point.