The EU is proposing to sanction companies in mainland China for the first time as part of its latest measures aimed at shutting down loopholes that allow Russia to route military technology via third countries to its weapons factories.

Three companies in mainland China, as well as four in Hong Kong and one in India, are on a 91-page document of companies and individuals who EU member states want to add to a growing sanctions list before the second anniversary of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

As the EU, the UK and US representatives prepare to meet in Brussels on Wednesday, a source said more tools were needed to ensure Moscow could not get around existing restrictions.

A source said: “Russia is straining every sinew to get around our sanctions but we need to do more. We need to shut down loopholes, target circumvention routes, drive down revenues further.”

Archive

  • Norgur@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’ll be interesting to see if Uncle Xi the bear sides with ideology and friendship or with profit.

    • Skua@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Russia and China don’t really share much ideologically anyway, do they? They’re allies of convenience to one another, and I think “allies” is putting it a bit too strongly anyway given that China doesn’t seem to be throwing any material support Russia’s way

        • Skua@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’m aware of the history, I just don’t think it’s a good description of the situation today. “Second World” is a term from when Russia was also calling itself communist and operating on a more similar economic system to China, even if tensions over the specifics and influence led to the Sino-Soviet split. It’s not particularly applicable in that sense to modern Russia, which has gone through some changes since the breakup of the Soviet Union, and the wiki article even points this out.

          • bstix@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            Not much has changed in their relationship even if both Russia and China no longer practice socialistic economy. They are de facto capitalist countries.

            The difference to other capitalist countries is only who they trade with, and because of the sanctions from the countries previously known as first world, their only trade partners are each other.

            China has not sent military assistance to Russia, but hey have increased their coal imports, enabling Russia to continue war production.

            • Skua@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              because of the sanctions from the countries previously known as first world, their only trade partners are each other.

              This isn’t even close to being true. Germany and Australia alone each account for more of China’s trade than Russia does. Trade between China and the EU or US dwarfs trade with Russia. Not to mention all the nearby large economies like Japan, South Korea, Indonesia, and Vietnam.

              If it comes down to nothing but money, China will never throw in with Russia because it makes enormously more with North America and Europe. There’s a clear incentive to play both sides of course, but if forced to choose then there’s only one obvious answer in financial terms.

              • bstix@feddit.dk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                Yes sorry. Russia’s only trade partner worth mentioning is China. China still trades with everyone, but as he article suggests it might not be as easy for them in the future.

      • boredtortoise@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        One could say that reactionary nationalism, authoritarianism etc words are the umbrella ideology. Even in a smaller scale fascists are able to work together despite their infighting

      • GenEcon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Both are imperialistic countries and therefore have the common goal of weakening the status quo of international law.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The EU is proposing to sanction companies in mainland China for the first time as part of its latest measures aimed at shutting down loopholes that allow Russia to route military technology via third countries to its weapons factories.

    As the EU, the UK and US representatives prepare to meet in Brussels on Wednesday, a source said more tools were needed to ensure Moscow could not get around existing restrictions.

    As part of the push, the EU’s diplomatic service has proposed adding about 20 firms, including three in mainland China, one in Turkey and one in India to an export blacklist of those providing support to Russia’s military.

    Two Russian shipping companies accused of transporting arms from North Korea to Dunai, a port east of Vladivostok, are also on the proposed 13th round of sanctions being hashed out in Brussels this week.

    An investigation by NK News in Seoul reported a sophisticated operation between Russia and Pyongyang, which has been subject to separate UN sanctions for years, using “twin vessels” to avoid surveillance in making weapons deliveries.

    In the schools for children aged between six and 19, pupils meet Russian soldiers, send cards and letters of support to the military on the frontline and learn how to handle drones, according to the document.


    The original article contains 542 words, the summary contains 213 words. Saved 61%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!