• Akisamb@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 个月前

      You can’t take one accident and use that to generalize.

      You need to take into account all accidents and see how worse humans are.

      https://arstechnica.com/cars/2023/12/human-drivers-crash-a-lot-more-than-waymos-software-data-shows/

      Cars are naturally dangerous. A robot car is going to have deaths no matter what. That does not mean they are bad if they mean a reduction of cars and accidents. Taxis if done properly can help a public transport system.

      • taladar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 个月前

        Most automated driving companies chose fair weather cities for their tests for a reason. Sure, if you include all human drivers driving in a blizzard at night on a curvy mountain road you get more crashes than AI drivers on sunny, bright days on wide, open city streets but that is not a fair comparison.

        • Akisamb@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 个月前

          I don’t agree. Curvy roads are dangerous, but there are much more conflicts in cities. You’re not going to have many pedestrians in curvy mountain roads.

          That said, you are right that the ideal comparison would be int the same city. But I’m not sure that the data exists, I’ll have to look this afternoon.

          That said, even if my data is not perfect, it’s much better than taking one accident and saying that self driving cars are dangerous. They are not going to be magically better than humans, after all driving is a difficult task, but we should at least crunch the numbers before dismissing them.

    • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      9 个月前

      I am not pro car, I am very much pro AI though

      At one point, calculators were worse than humans at the same job. All it took was time and money and now I think everyone can agree we’re better off not having to wait 20+ minutes to get a quadratic equation solved.

      • kciwsnurb
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 个月前

        How is solving a quadratic equation, whose analytical solution is known, equal to driving?

        • biddy@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 个月前

          Of course they’re not using AI to solve quadratics, it’s part of the calculator analogy. It’s a whole lot quicker to solve a quadratic formula in a calculator than by hand.

        • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 个月前

          No, I use a calculator. My point was that technologies that suck now get better as they age.

          • pedz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 个月前

            It mostly sucks ungodly amounts of electricity for a mediocre result. And I don’t think the energy consumed for things like driving a two ton vehicle around, when people can take a bus or a train, is worth it.