• newjunkcity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think the most annoying thing here is the decision to blanket ban other browsers. Why not just have a little drop-down bar at the top that says ‘You may encounter issues, we recommend browsing this site with Google Chrome’, instead of completely blocking access? The cynic in me suspects it’s linked to advertising.

    If one changes the user agent in Firefox so that it announces itself as Chrome, most of these sites work just fine. Adobe Express is the last example I tried.

    • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Because that would reveal that their site is flawed, instead of blaming the customer for not using the right browser.

      • aluminium@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Doesn’t have to be, some features are only available in certain browsers (usually Chromium). For example AFAIK Chromium is the only browser that allows you to connect in the browser to Bluetooth devices, its the only browser that can access for example a phone’s NFC chip or that can interact with USB devices.

        • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          That’s my point. Example, meet Sarah. Sarah goes to www.megacorp.com to pair her new MegaDevice via NFC. She gets to the pairing page and there’s only a small banner that tells her her browser may not work. She doesn’t see it and starts the syncing. It fails repeatedly. Her first thought will be “O… Mygod! mergacorp’s website is like, so. Broken!” Now example B: Sarah goes to the website and sees “WRONG BROWSER, use chrome instead” on the screen in big. Now Sarah thinks “Oh, I’m stupid, it’s my bad, I should use Chrome instead instead of Firefox. Firefox is the worst”. Then end.