stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to Technology@kbin.social · 1 year agoMusk says Twitter will no longer have a light mode, making dark mode the default option9to5mac.comexternal-linkmessage-square98fedilinkarrow-up154arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up154arrow-down1external-linkMusk says Twitter will no longer have a light mode, making dark mode the default option9to5mac.comstopthatgirl7@kbin.social to Technology@kbin.social · 1 year agomessage-square98fedilinkfile-text
Since Elon Musk became Twitter’s CEO, he’s been pushing through a lot of changes to the social network. But perhaps…
minus-squareWhirlybirdlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoWhy did you conveniently leave off the rest of my sentence there? Also come on…talking about how many birds might have died from the rockets explosion way up in the sky, when the likely answer is zero? Really?
minus-squarestopthatgirl7@kbin.socialOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoWhy did you cherry pick the one thing you can dismiss and ignore that they’ve been causing actual environmental damage?
minus-squareWhirlybirdlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoWhen that’s one of the first and main points brought up in the article and it’s so stupid it basically screams “this article is garbage”. You’re talking about environmental damage limited to some tiny little area around the launch site. If that’s the best you’ve got, give up.
minus-squarestopthatgirl7@kbin.socialOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoSome people are definitely worth talking to and discussing opposing viewpoints. You do not seem to be one of those people. Have a lovely day.
minus-squareTheSaneWriter@lemmy.thesanewriter.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoThey did the same thing in my comment thread. Ignored my source, cherry-picked a single argument they had a rebuttal for, and dismissed any culpability SpaceX could have had.
minus-squareWhirlybirdlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoAre you the person that blamed musk for the government choosing him over building a high speed rail? If not, what are you talking about?
Why did you conveniently leave off the rest of my sentence there?
Also come on…talking about how many birds might have died from the rockets explosion way up in the sky, when the likely answer is zero? Really?
Why did you cherry pick the one thing you can dismiss and ignore that they’ve been causing actual environmental damage?
When that’s one of the first and main points brought up in the article and it’s so stupid it basically screams “this article is garbage”.
You’re talking about environmental damage limited to some tiny little area around the launch site. If that’s the best you’ve got, give up.
Some people are definitely worth talking to and discussing opposing viewpoints.
You do not seem to be one of those people. Have a lovely day.
They did the same thing in my comment thread. Ignored my source, cherry-picked a single argument they had a rebuttal for, and dismissed any culpability SpaceX could have had.
Are you the person that blamed musk for the government choosing him over building a high speed rail?
If not, what are you talking about?