• themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    We have that. They’re called “plants.” If we just stop cutting down all the trees and poisoning the seas, plants will capture the carbon in the air and return it to the ground when they die. Or it will become part of the natural food chain.

    So don’t worry, either we will stop destroying all of the ecosystems, or the plants can fix the planet after we’re all gone.

    • ReCursing@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Cutting the trees down is fine (well the ones we plant for the purpose I mean) - turn them into books and then store the books. As an added benefit you get books!

    • GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m not a scientist by any stretch, but would disposing of plastics with these mushrooms in a terrarium of sorts help? They would have to be big and numerous.

      The mushrooms would break down the plastics into CO2 and water and the plants would absorb the CO2 and water. As the plastics start to go away, we could add more of our excess plastic to keep the cycle going.

      If this works, it also keeps the plastic eating mushrooms contained and away from all the essential plastics we have today.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Sounds like a good plan. I don’t know. Considering the rate at which we produce plastic, I doubt we could ever grow enough mushrooms to keep up, but it would be worth funding the research.

    • School_Lunch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’ve always wondered how big an impact burying all grass clippings would have… I assume very little since I’ve never heard it mentioned before.

      • zout@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        You would have to bury them really deep to prevent them from being converted fully back to CO2, or worse methane, by other organisms.

        • bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Not to mention, all the nutrients that would normally be returned by their decomposition will never return back into the ecosystem.

          • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            We have a simple biologocial solution for all of that. Peatlands. They transfer the carbon into more and more stable chemical compounds that end up being sequestered. All the coal that is extracted now used to be peat some hundred million years ago.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Just leaving them on the ground allows them to decompose naturally. A better option is to not cut your grass, or have a native groundcover lawn.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Well it’s going to happen one way or the other. The only question is whether humans will be there for it.

          • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I wouldn’t underestimate our capacity to fuck up the planet. When the food runs out and the water riots spread, things are going to go south very quickly for the human race. We like to make post apocalyptic movies about how we survive in the desert that used to be Iowa, building war-cars from scrap and isolated communities from the remainders. The reality is that almost everyone will die off without the electricity, medicine, and food production we have all come to rely upon. Gasoline will expire in the tanks of a million cars, and the ammo will run out faster than the potato chips. Farms will be pillaged, and GM seed stocks don’t produce a new generation.

            When society breaks down, all the little things will fall away, and we’ll all realize how actually few survival skills people actually have.

      • anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        we can also not just let the entire world become Forrest.

        We could make charcoal from the trees and bury the same amount we dug up, but as long as we burn coal for power it’s kind of pointless.