• Meta shares jumped on Friday after profit tripled in the fourth quarter and the company issued its first-ever dividend.
    • Revenue rose 25% in the quarter for Meta, marking the fastest rate of growth for any period since mid-2021 as the online ad market rebounded.
    • Investors praised Meta’s decision to issue a dividend, a rare step for a high-growth technology company.

Meta shares closed up more than 20% on Friday after the company reported a tripling in fourth-quarter profit and issued its first-ever dividend.

Revenue rose 25% in the fourth quarter for Meta to $40.1 billion from $32.2 billion a year earlier. That’s the fastest rate of growth for any period since mid-2021, and offers further evidence that the online ad market is continuing to rebound. Meta’s net income more than tripled, to $14 billion from $4.65 billion a year earlier.

The company is forecasting first-quarter sales to be in the range of $34.5 billion to $37 billion. Analysts were expecting revenue of $33.8 billion.

  • hannes3120@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Those are just the biggest available ETFs and Fonds. Everyone that owns a couple of MSCI or FTSE fonds technically owns a meta stock but with one of those 3 acting as shareholder

    “Shadow Banking” and “ultra rich influence” sounds an awful lot like dog whistling to me.

    • Deceptichum@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      “Shadow Banking” and “ultra rich influence” sounds an awful lot like dog whistling to me.

      Sounds like the 1% to me.

      • cosmic_slate@dmv.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Well…more like the funds that back everyone’s 401ks/IRAs/etc

        Edit: responded to wrong level of comment

        • Deceptichum@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’m talking about the terms “Shadow Banking”/“ultra rich influence” and the insinuation that criticism of rich people is actually coded anti-Semitism, not the etfs themselves.