- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.
The original was posted on /r/worldnews by /u/mvanigan on 2024-02-02 16:44:56.
The original was posted on /r/worldnews by /u/mvanigan on 2024-02-02 16:44:56.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Greta Thunberg and four co-defendants have been found not guilty of breaking the law when they refused to follow police instructions to move on during a climate protest.
District Judge John Laws threw out a public order charge due to “no evidence” and added police attempted to impose “unlawful” conditions during a protest.
The court heard that protesters started to gather near the hotel in October last year at around 07:30 and police engaged with them about improving access for members of the public, which the prosecution alleged had been made “impossible”.
The judge rejected the submission as “the main entrance was accessible (meaning) that the condition… was unnecessary when the defendants were arrested”.
Ms Thunberg appeared at Westminster Magistrates’ Court after previously denying breaching the Public Order Act 1986.
Ms Thunberg appeared at court along with two Fossil Free London protesters and two Greenpeace activists, who also pleaded not guilty to the same offence.
The original article contains 352 words, the summary contains 155 words. Saved 56%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!