new to this linux stuff sorry

  • dino@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Do you have any arguments on why you think Arch is easier to use than Debian? Common sense tells me there is none, despite the obvious “well any package is available in AUR so I can install it easypeezy” yolo.

    • djsaskdja@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s not just the AUR, but that’s part of it. Every time I use Debian, I’m shocked by how difficult it is to install any proprietary software. I tried to make it easy on myself by installing Flatpak, but even that didn’t seem to work on my system for some reason. I’m sure it was a fixable problem, but I just found myself fighting it more than I liked. The Arch wiki is also incredible and has been a great help when I’ve encountered similar issues over there.

      • dino@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Totally agree that Archwiki is handsdown the best wiki for Linux. But Debian doesn’t deserve this flak imo. It has its place and use cases. Also depending on your requirements as a user can be fine for desktop.

        • djsaskdja@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I love that Debian exists even if I don’t personally enjoy using it. It’s a great baseline for others to build off of and it’s rock solid reliable if that’s your top priority. I just struggle to make it work for my workflows. I’m sure plenty of people would say the same thing about Arch too. I don’t think either deserve a negative reputation.