caption

a screenshot of the text:

Tech companies argued in comments on the website that the way their models ingested creative content was innovative and legal. The venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, which has several investments in A.I. start-ups, warned in its comments that any slowdown for A.I. companies in consuming content “would upset at least a decade’s worth of investment-backed expectations that were premised on the current understanding of the scope of copyright protection in this country.”

underneath the screenshot is the “Oh no! Anyway” meme, featuring two pictures of Jeremy Clarkson saying “Oh no!” and “Anyway”

screenshot (copied from this mastodon post) is of a paragraph of the NYT article “The Sleepy Copyright Office in the Middle of a High-Stakes Clash Over A.I.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    We do need copyright reform, but also fuck “AI.” I couldn’t care less about them infringing on proprietary works, but they’re also infringing on copyleft works and for that they deserve to be shut the fuck down.

    Either that, or all the output of their “AI” needs to be copyleft.

    • SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Not just the output. One could construct that training your model on GPL content which would have it create GPL content means that the model itself is now also GPL.

      It’s why my company calls GPL parasitic, use it once and it’s everywhere.

      This is something I consider to be one of the main benefits of this license.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        It already is.

        If you mean that the output of AI is already copyleft, then sure, I completely agree! What I meant to write that we “need” is legal acknowledgement of that factual reality.

        The companies running these services certainly don’t seem to think so, however, so they need to be disabused of their misconception.

        I apologize if that was unclear. (Not sure the vitriol was necessary, but whatever.)