Films that may have flopped but not because of you, because you did your part and bought a ticket.

  • wjrii@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I still maintain that while not the same disaster as a film that it was as an investment, John Carter was muddy, its source material was past its sell-by date, and it topped out at “okay.” I’m not at all sure added marketing budget would have made enough additional fans to have made it worthwhile.

    • magnetosphere @beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The John Carter source material was so old that I imagine the movie was championed by dinosaur executives who remembered loving it when they were kids. Their underlings were afraid to say no.

      That probably isn’t how things went down, but it’s my head canon.

      • wjrii@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        IIRC it was a passion property for Andrew Stanton, who was coming off of one of the most insanely good Pixar resumes in an era of amazing Pixar resumes.

        Unfortunately, when something is old and influential, a modern audience is going to have seen things influenced by it for decades, and the original can sometimes become a kind of “inside baseball” that only appeals to the passion of people who are into the historical context of their fields.

        Nobody is making millions off of Citizen Kane or Metropolis.