Techie@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoUnpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specificationvivaldi.comexternal-linkmessage-square100fedilinkarrow-up1773arrow-down113cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1760arrow-down1external-linkUnpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specificationvivaldi.comTechie@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square100fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squarehightrix@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·1 year agoThis is not the users problem. This is googles problem. If they want to give away a thing for free, then don’t be surprised when people take that thing for free.
minus-squarejoe@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoMy point was that people should have known it was never free to begin with.
minus-squareHello Hotel@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoapologist use that soundbyte even if thats not what you ment. Ive made the same mistake.
This is not the users problem. This is googles problem.
If they want to give away a thing for free, then don’t be surprised when people take that thing for free.
My point was that people should have known it was never free to begin with.
apologist use that soundbyte even if thats not what you ment. Ive made the same mistake.