“I’m just ashamed that this bill even came into fruition,” a Lexington council member said.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Lots of other languages have a dedicated word for second person plural, but English only has dialects that do.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        You can be used plurally. Ye used to be commonly used as a second person plural but now sounds old fashioned because it fell into disuse.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          “You” isn’t a dedicated word, since it’s typically used in singular. It’s common to have something specific to the task in other languages.

          • aesthelete@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Agreed, it’s a little awkward to use you as a plural and that’s what ye used to be used for.

            But ye is even more awkward. I suspect through frequent usage, “you” as a plural would start to feel just fine.

            In common conversation, it’s my experience that “you guys” winds up being the winner in American English. But it gets really dreadful when the speaker is trying to address a crowd with possessives and they’re using that expression.

            “This is what I was asking about from your guy(essess) [sic] presentation last week”…I just…wince a bit when I hear it…and I’ve said things like it myself but that doesn’t make it any better.

      • Marin_Rider
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        in Australia the equivilant would probably be “yous”