• GBU_28@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    I mean…you said a bunch of pro WORKER things.

    The company wishes the workers were happy without ANY additional pro worker things.

    Like, it’s not malice, it’s the nature of capitalism. The company wants to pay the absolute minimum for labor. And that goes for coverage, benefits, talking, thinking whatever.

    Conversely the employee wants the very most they can get for their labor.

    This is the only logical statement a company can make, wrapped in a nice package.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Generally I agree, but in this case Costco is usually pretty good with compensation. When I worked there 12+ years ago they were paying cashiers $20/hr+. Most places won’t even pay $20/hr now.

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        If Costco thought they could get or retain staff of the quality they want OR maintain a public image they want AND pay less, they would.

        Again not malice.

        If I could get someone to pay me double for the exact same work, I’d jump in a heartbeat.

        Costco minimize, employee maximize.

    • BlackRoseAmongThorns@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      While i agree on a surface level, i think we should put an emphasis to continue the push to unionize if we are ever to move past this system.

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Well yeah, I totally agree, I’m just saying everyone is kinda surprised with the company’s response. Within the current system the options are either “no unions!” Or what Costco said