• PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I mean, paladins are creatures who thrive on extremes. Being a neutral Paladin would be difficult, unless their oath had something to do with balance and/or harmony? Typically speaking, the Paladin will fall back to their oath when confronted with a new situation. And oaths are rarely flexible enough to allow for middle ground.

    But yeah, Paladin of Vengeance is often Doom Guy and/or Batman. Zero chill, because they can’t stand for injustice, and their oath calls them to make things right even when the law fails to do so.

  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Bad paladins and good paladins.

    Or is Captain Amurica considered a warlock of capitalism?

  • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 months ago

    John Brown started out on the left, but after he died he followed the confederates to Hell and became the one on the right

      • eerongal@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s never really specified. They call him the “cavalier”, which in 2e was a kit that either paladins or fighters could take. He occasionally did some sorta-paladiny stuff like when he bubbled with a force bubble type thing to protect his friends

        • legios
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          11 months ago

          Cavalier was a first edition class (Yes I’m old)

          • eerongal@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            I’ve never actually played 1e or OD&D, i started in 2e. Still makes me old, though, for the record.

      • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I’d argue he always held true to his beliefs, even when the government shifted around him. That’s more lawful than a character who allows their actions to be swayed by external pressure. He’s meant to be the ideal that America strives towards, which would include standing up to the government when it does fucked up shit. He held onto his beliefs and moral compass, even when the government had labeled him a rebel for doing so.

          • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            [Insert “Lawful doesn’t mean they follow the law. It means they follow a set of rules and refer to those rules for guidance when uncertain about how to proceed. Chaotic means they make it up as they go” argument here.]

            You can have a lawful evil assassin who breaks the law by murdering people. As long as they have a strict code of conduct (like maybe they never kill kids, always kill to make a statement, never kill for free, etc,) then they are lawful. Because the law of the land may change, but the character’s code won’t. That code is what makes them lawful; Not following the law of the land.

  • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    Ελληνικά
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Doomguy is a ranger/barbarian who has a personal vendetta against demons after his animal companion was killed.

  • FunkyMonk@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    The Third type is a winged lizard creature so that doesn’t really apply here… unless you want to roll a dragonborn… huuuuuuuuhhhhhhh?