I can’t give more approval for this woman, she handled everything so well.

The backstory is that Cloudflare overhired and wanted to reduce headcount, rightsize, whatever terrible HR wording you choose. Instead of admitting that this was a layoff, which would grant her things like severance and unemployment - they tried to tell her that her performance was lacking.

And for most of us (myself included) we would angrily accept it and trash the company online. Not her, she goes directly against them. It of course doesn’t go anywhere because HR is a bunch of robots with no emotions that just parrot what papa company tells them to, but she still says what all of us wish we did.

(Warning, if you’ve ever been laid off this is a bit enraging and can bring up some feelings)

  • qarbone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    Because it’s easier that way. Rather than protracted recruiting processes that really dig deep into the current needs of the company after detailed evaluation of current projects and current manpower, just hire anyone who looks halfway decent and fire the ones that don’t seem worth it whenever is convenient.

    • EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Because it’s easier that way.

      In the short term, easier. But for long term sustainability, no…But what does that matter when you get a bailout every time you fail?

      • qarbone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        What about the way we’ve seen markets operate makes you believe they care about the long-term? Long-term is someone else’s problem.