• lugal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    99
    ·
    10 months ago

    The concept of limited sick days is still so wild for me … if you’re sick, you’re sick.

    • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      There has to be some limit for the company. Let’s forget a minute about big evil corporation and take a little local company that hire a new person that is needed to run the shop. If this person is absent unlimited and you don’t have the funds to hire a replacement, should you just close the shop? It doesn’t mean we can put an arbitrary limit on sickness but rather than at some point the company have the liberty to let you go if you can’t fulfil your part of the contract anymore in the forsable future. It doesn’t mean there shouldn’t be a system to help the sick person recover, but maybe that’s not the company’s job past a certain time, and rather the role of social/health insurance.

      • b0gl@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        72
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Here in Sweden your workplace will pay 80% of your salary for the first 7 days, and then if you are still sick, you need to get a doctor’s note and then the state will pay you instead.

        Also if your kid is sick you can be home with 80% salary paid by the state.

      • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Yeah, this is why in many countries, Australia included, part of parental leave is paid by the state (it’s at minimum wage, which isn’t super high, but much higher than other countrie), and the company isn’t required to pay anything extra (but must let you take leave).

        Most employers however, are much more generous than this to attract talent.

    • phx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      10 months ago

      Where I’ve worked you’d hit a limit after a certain number of consecutive sick days and then move on the a short or long term disability package which wouldn’t be at full pay but not ruinous either. I’m not sure those are usable to care for somebody else though

    • Whirlybird
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Most workplaces are happy for you to take 300 sick days a year if you want - but they’ll be unpaid. The concept of “unlimited paid sick days” is ridiculous.

    • platypus_plumba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think the problem is that people will obviously abuse this if they were left unchecked. It’s sad but the root of these restrictions aren’t just companies being assholes, it is also a minority of employees being assholes. They drive companies to take these stances.

      • lugal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        10 months ago

        Citation needed.

        It’s not like you say “I feel sick for 6 months, deal with it” but you have to check with your doctor regularly. That’s how it works in Germany. And at some point, you get less payment and when you are chronically ill, you will lose your job at some point. But it’s not a set number of days per year

        • Knightfox@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s not a set number for the US either, we have Family Medical Leave (FMLA). When they say you have sick days it’s referring to paid sick leave by your job. If you’re sick you can be out for sick leave for quite a long time and the jobs can’t do anything against you, they just don’t have to pay you. If you’re so sick that you’re on FMLA for a long time you’ll probably qualify for Short Term Disability which you might also supplement with Short Term disability insurance.

      • Madlaine@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        Well, it’s not like a significant part of the world is already working with “unlimited” sick days.

        It’s not really unlimited, anyway. You will need doctors notices (ofter after a few days), after a while some attestation from certain state doctors, after a while the money will be paid by your health insurance, after a while you will loose your job.

        Not to mention that you forfeit chances for promotions and raises.

        Taking enormous amounts of sick days won’t be without consequences. Especially not if unjustified.

        The difference is that I don’t have a sickness budget.

        If I’m sick, i’m sick.

        If I’m suspiciously often sick, my employer will talk to me.

      • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think this way of thinking is reductive. There are always going to be people who will abuse the system. You can have all the checks you want, but it’s gonna happen anyway. However, these people are a minority. Most people do want to work, and having the ability to rest and recover when they’re sick no matter how frequent it may be, means they’re doing and feeling much better at work. We shouldn’t refuse to implement things that will benefit everyone because a few people might abuse it.