• ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    11 months ago

    So I wonder what degree of slavery we’d have ended up with? A little? Almost as much? 50% slavery?

    What a fucking idiot.

    • purplepuppy@links.hackliberty.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Slavery is already legal in US if you arrest a person first. That is an exception of the 13th amendment,

      I assume that is why US has the biggest prison population in the World and is 6th country in the World by per capita incarceration rate (first western country). If China and India would incarcerate it’s citizens as much as US, China would have 4 times and India 10 times it’s current prison population. And of course white people are about 8 times less likely to be incarcerated then black people.

      “Land of the free”

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I agree with your overall point.

        My only quibble is China (and other heavily authoritarian countries that aren’t forthcoming with data). I don’t know that we can trust numbers coming out of China, given that many subjects are heavily censored. For instance, are the Uyghurs counted as in prison if they’re in focible “re-education” camps? Do people that simply disappear get counted in those figures?

        • purplepuppy@links.hackliberty.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I don’t know, but you can say that for any state. Does Guantanamo Bay prisoners count in US, they are offbroad just so they can legally be tortured. It is all play with rules. Do 2 million civilans killed in US invasions in middle east count? Do Palestinians count to be imrpissioned by the US since Israel couln’t do it without their support, to trap them in those regions. Either way, even if not inside the country, US definitely is more agressive overall and kills and imprissions more people. It is just that in the western world, their media propaganda is a lot stronger than Chinas.

          • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Does Guantanamo Bay prisoners count in US

            Even if you counted them, it would have a negligible effect on statistics. Last time I checked, there were less than 10 people being held there from the GWOT.

            • purplepuppy@links.hackliberty.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              No one can really know how many people are illegally improsioned, directly or indirectly, through puppet governments, by US or by China. We can either messure by the numbers we have, or we can make up our own numbers. There is no reason to believe that China lies about it’s numbers any more then US, everybody uses some loopholes. US is funding many other governments, like Saudi Arabia and Israel to put people in prisons and kill people for them, all around the World. I don’t see the point of questioning China numbers and not US numbers.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Jesus, I thought that back guy was wearing a Confederate flag hat for a second…

      • ExLisper@linux.community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I always wonder how did this exception end up there. From what I checked it’s not clear who proposed it. I just imagine that after fighting extremely bloody and devastating war over it they sat down to draft the amendments and someone went “Are we sure we want to ban all slavery?”. It’s crazy that they decided to keep it only giving courts authority over it.

        • purplepuppy@links.hackliberty.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          People who write laws benefit from slavery and having lower economic classes. It was never their true intention to get rid of slavery, but only to calm the citizens that are rebeling against it. Overtime they figured smarter ways of slavery. Free slaves > but because of private property they now dont own anything still > they have to take any job under any working conditions > back to slaves again. If some escape this wage slavery, by not working or something, they make up a reason to arrest them, like vagrancy (illegal to be unemployed or homeless) or for not paying your debts or for some stupid reasons as drugs (planted by cops or not) or even dumber for resisting arrest even if there was nothing to be arrested for in the first place.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      The funny thing is that Lincoln pretty much said they could keep their slaves for the sake of keeping the union together. He had made it clear he wanted to abolish slavery, but he wasn’t going to risk the nation over it. He basically opened with an offer to let the south have everything.

      The South, however, believed that the day would come where the US would abolish slavery, and they needed to get out before that happened.

      Given the South were handed everything they wanted in the default position, no amount of negotiation would have worked.

      • Red_October@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        So what you’re saying is, Trump was Wrong? Holy shit someone needs to tell the Press! Word needs to get out that Trump was wrong about a thing! Nobody will believe it!

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I suppose Trump was right… The south could have easily negotiated to get what they wanted. So while the free states could not have negotiated, the slave states absolutely could have. They were just pissy that too many new states were choosing to be free states and they were outnumbered and wanted a country where they weren’t outnumbered on slavery.

          • paddirn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Although I hate to attribute anything Trump says to having any sort of “deeper” meaning, I do wonder if there’s a sort of implied threat here, he does tend to talk like a mob boss and tries not to explicitly get himself nailed for things, at least sometimes. Like he’s really saying, “we’re going to have another Civil War if I lose or if you keep coming after me in court, but it doesn’t have to be like that, we can negotiate…” which I feel like others in his camp have floated that idea previously. They assume the multiple felonies that Trump has been indicted for is all political theater meant to put pressure on him and that all he has to do is just leave the race and that will make all his problems go away. He’s trying to use his candidacy more as a bargaining chip, as a Get-Out-of-Jail-Free card, while his supporters are ready to tear down American democracy in the name of that orange POS.

            • jj4211@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              That was the thought that occurred to me when I originally said no negotiation. My amendment to the position that it was entirely within the power of the insurrectionists to negotiate was after reconsidering the situation at the time, and amused by extrapolating it to Trump’s current position. Yes, negotiation is possible, so go ahead Trump and make concessions. Oh he didn’t mean a negotiation where he/insurrectionists would have to make any concessions? Well that wouldn’t have been a possibility for the 1860s, and I don’t think it would work now.

    • Moira_Mayhem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      Fucking secessionists already attacked Ft. Sumter before abolishing slavery was even a big issue, they just were stupid drunk on power and thought they had a righteous cause. I have a gaming mouse that has been in use longer than the confederacy existed.