• Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I will say what i have said to another user here.

    I did not intend to state that fomo was a crime. I didn’t actually say that at any point.

    I did say, and mean, that coercion is a crime. That is true from a legal standpoint.

    I then gave my opinion, or my philosophical argument, that i believe that fomo is a form of coercion.

    It’s not complete gibberish, and i wasn’t lying. You just misinterpreted what i meant.

    I coild have been more clear in my argument, but it’s disingenuous and kinda shitty of you to call it complete gibberish when you clearly understood what i was saying.

    Stop trying to aggressively argue with me when we could just discuss this like normal people.

    • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I then gave my opinion, or my philosophical argument, rhat i believe that fomo is a form or coercion.

      This is not an opinion. It is not a “philosophical argument”. It’s a lie.

      And it’s absolutely incoherent gibberish. None of the words you are using mean anything close to what you’re claiming they do. You make posts, using your arbitrary, completely incorrect definition of words no one but you knows, then need many, many posts of consistently changing your wrong definitions for anyone to even be able to follow. There’s no path to a “discussion” when nothing you’re posting tracks in any way.

      • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, it is. You are wrong. If you can’t follow it, that’s your problem. Not mine.