• Nougat@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Let’s not forget that even the 20-episode season greats had their fair share of real stinker episodes, those stinkers increasing in frequency as the series dragged on several seasons longer than it should have due to sheer momentum. And that a huge proportion of 20 episode season television series just sucked and were forgotten about.

    We’ve also moved beyond the three-camera stage plays with very few sets to television shows where one episode is shot on more sets than Friends used for its entire run - because it makes better television. Episodes are also longer than 22 minutes now. (That’s what YouTube is for.) These factors demand a lot more effort, which means there’s not enough time or labor to pull together 20 episodes in a year.

    • Kepabar@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think it’s that we miss those three camera stage plays.

      Atleast I do.

      Those long seasons let us have silly, off the wall and yes, sometimes plain bad episodes.

      But I’ll take them for the extra world building, character development and slower pacing that we get in return.

      I don’t want or need television to be movie quality. I’m fine taking a hit in production quality if it gets us back some of those lost elements.

    • Spazsquatch@lemmy.studio
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s also worth keeping in mind that the goal of television for much of its recent history was to hit the right number of episodes that you could get picked up for re-run syndication, which was a cash-cow. Quantity mattered more than quality after a certain point.