• Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    What did it for me to know they went waaaaaay too far was the:

    -killing three of their hostages while they were holding a white flag

    -a sniper killing two women inside a church affiliated with Rome

    • AreaSIX @lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Got it, killing thousands of brown muslim babies wasn’t enough to awaken your empathy. But killing three young Jews and two Christians is where you drew your moral line.

      Also interesting that the church being ‘affiliated with Rome’ was somehow a factor in this excellent judgement of your’s. Should we assume that you were fine as long as the ones killed are Christians affiliated what say, the Armenian Orthodox church? Better late than never I guess…

      • Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        The reason I chose these events are very simple. They are glaringly clear events that show without a doubt the intent of killing civilians. First, the hostage situation clearly shows that they do not recognise surrender, even if they wanted.

        Second, in a way akin to the United Nations, the Catholic Church is a relatively powerful institution independent from the conflicting parties that was unlikely to harbour weapons inside (even if more likely than UN facilities). However, unlike the indiscriminate UN bombings, the killing was done during the day inside the church by a sniper, again, making it glaringly clear.

        Finally, at this point, most people inside churches aren’t even Christian, as most of the Christian population fled a while ago, and the people that remain are actually following the bible and harbouring those that need it.