My wife works in a restaurant, and the power-tripping manager has instituted a new policy where all shift changes must be approved by management. I think that is reasonable enough, but they’re also asking the originally-scheduled employee why they are switching shifts, then approving or denying based on the answer.

For example, her coworker (Tom) wanted Monday afternoon off, and Harry agreed to cover the shift. The manager asked Tom why he wanted Harry to work for him, and Tom said, “I have a softball game.” Manager denied the shift change because it was “unnecessary”.

Is this legal? I feel like if you’re able to find someone to cover your shift, you don’t owe management any explanation why you need the time off. How should my wife approach this situation? Colorado, USA BTW.

  • neekz0r@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    100% this. A former coworker was fired a month ago because he filed an HR complaint about his boss, because the boss was being an asshole to him (according to co worker).

    This is the same boss who joked about beating his wife and kicking his dog in a meeting, so I’m fairly certain it’s true.

    HR is NEVER your friend.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sounds like he didn’t have documented proof sufficient to bring a suit against the company. Sucks but save your emails. Forwarding is free

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If that’s the case and they aren’t leaving out pertinent information, that’s a pretty clear case of retaliation, which is illegal in many/most US states, even those without robust worker protection laws.