I’d much rather see sites like Lemmy, PeerTube, and Mastodon see widespread adoption then the dystopian cyberpunk fever dream in the head of Zuckerburg. Did you not read the novel dude? It’s a freaking warning! That’s like Jeff Bezos reading Fahrenheit 451 and going “holy crap dude, gotta make that a reality like, yesterday!” I want the Fediverse, not the Metaverse! Thank you for coming to my TedTalk.

  • wrath-sedan@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Slightly unrelated but I feel like there has been such a proliferation of -verses from the Metaverse to the MCU that I’ve developed a negative association with all -verses as a marketing ploy despite my love for the Fediverse specifically. While probably not a realistic replacement, I think it’s fun when people sometimes use “the Federation” as it makes us sound like a network of allied planets engaged in intergalactic combat in a pulpy sci-fi series.

  • TehSr0c@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 years ago

    We, the global media company, are proud to announce we have finally created the brainfuckinator from award winning sci-fi novel “don’t build the brainfuckinator”

  • Retronautickz@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 years ago

    Well the fediverse works. The fediverse is what internet was meant to be, before corporations sized it and made it the nightmare that centralised social media is. The “metaverse” is just Zuckerberg’s desperation to maintain his decadent model of social media afloat.

  • ConsciousCode@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    What’s funny about the “metaverse” is that by the definition from Snow Crash, the internet as we know it is already a metaverse: a bunch of distinct digital spaces which users are free to “travel” between, and the system as a whole isn’t owned by any one group. Conversely, Meta’s idea of the metaverse is, by definition, not a metaverse because it’d be owned by them as a platform.

    • Hyperi0n@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 years ago

      Dude, I never thought of that! And some users have already pointed out that the metaverse idea is already dead and Zuck’s company is in shambles. This is a weird time for social media isn’t it? Facebook’s company is slowly dying, Tik-Tok is getting banned (or at least in the process of it) Elon killed Twitter, and the u/spez is murdering Reddit. This is the perfect time for the Fediverse isn’t it?

  • techno156@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 years ago

    “Metaverse” is mostly dead, anyway. It’s basically turned into VR Bitcoin, and a worse version of the already existing VR.

    A.I. seems to be the new shiny thing investors are moving into, and I’d be surprised if Facebook didn’t just silently remove references to the metaverse eventually.

    Fediverse, for the slightly cringey “verse” name, does seem to at least be trying something new. Federating multiple completely different sites like Mastodon, Kbin, or Lemmy isn’t really something that was done before (that I can remember, feel free to correct if I’m wrong). You had some integrations with things like RSS and APIs before, but you couldn’t just go on Twitter and post/reply/read a Reddit thread from within twitter, or you’d have to do it with a complicated network of bots.

      • fuser@quex.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s a good analogy - in the days before email, all you had was a username @ your BBS (Bulletin Board Server). You dialed into your local BBS’s landlines with a modem - they usually had 2-4 numbers available, so that gives you an idea of scale. The BBS systems were federated so user@bbs1 could see and respond to the same threads as user@bbs2. It was nice - it worked pretty much like the fediverse actually - and the tone was similar.

        The messaging systems on the BBS communities evolved into email and Usenet before big money came along and fucked everything up.

  • Belgdore@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 years ago

    I hope we can find a stable balance so that there will no longer be phases to the internet. I think federation is a move in the right direction for that purpose.

    I think this fits the topic of free and open source software. those things are needed to end the cycle of venture capital and advertising destroying what should be public spaces.

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yes, the Fediverse is actually awesome. It’s decentralized, there’s so many open-source implementations, etc etc. The Fediverse is what Zuckerberg wishes the Metaverse could be.

    • Spendies@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      I respectfully disagree.

      Zuck wants the metaverse to be what they show in the Ready Player One movie, which is not even close to what the fediverse is trying to be in any way.

      He wants everyone to live in a virtual world that he alone controls.

      • marv99@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        I agree (also respectfully), just wanted to add, as I have seen the movie yesterday (and know the book), that the Oasis in Ready Player One is a not really a bad place. So the original OASIS is not what Meta want to have.

        IOI (and Meta) want to transform an OASIS into their dystopian metaverse, like shown in the movie when IOI proudly presented their plans: a company’s dream of monetarizing every breath you take while exploiting everyone except their shareholders.

          • Spendies@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Yeah, I think you’re right. My memory of the book is rustier, I know they changed a lot, and I can’t remember all of the differences. My thought was mostly that Zuck is looking for more along the lines of what the evil corporation that wants to take it over would turn it into. Not what it was to start with.

  • makmarian@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 years ago

    There is an open source metaverse-like project called Third Room that is built on Matrix. I have not tested it too much, but still an interesting project

  • ArtZuron@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I think that there was just too much negative association between Facebook’s tomfuckery for the last 20 years and the Metaverse. There was no way to divorce the two. Young people didn’t want to use it because Facebook is cringe, and old people didn’t know how, or couldn’t give two shits to learn how, to use it.

    That and the Metaverse is using tech that was dated in the early 2000s. There were multiplayer online browser games that I played on as a kid that had better quality than the Metaverse. VRchat is 8 years old and is better in basically every way, and it’s VRCHAT.

    Long story short, they screwed it from the start by being the ones that made it. It might have worked if it weren’t for the company making it.

    Edit: Does anyone remember the fashion show they tried to put on in the Metaverse, where they sold crappy dresses for the game for like hundreds of dollars or something? Metaverse was designed to be a blatant and lazy cash grab, and that’s why it turned into such an unmitigated cash sink.

  • Osayidan@social.vmdk.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    Fediverse and the internet in general is already the metaverse. All we need to make it look like in sci-fi is for majority of users to interact with it in a 3D virtual space instead of 2D. XR technologies will get us there eventually but content on those platforms is lacking at best and is very far from general adoption.

    The next big hurdle is large corporations trying to “create” the metaverse, which already exists, and control it. Which basically disqualifies anything they are doing from ever being the metaverse. I actually felt some degree of rage when facebook renamed themselves to meta, they single-handedly ruined public perception of the concept, anyone talking about it now in the general public is not taken seriously.

    What’s also missing of the metaverse right now is owning your identity and taking it with you everywhere you go, fediverse comes close to that concept but is far from perfect since it’s pretty hard to interact with other fediverse technologies right now, if I’m on lemmy I don’t see any way to consume/interact with mastodon content or kbin content. However being able to traverse every instance of lemmy out there using one account, hosted on a server run by myself or someone else is a start.

    • s900mhz@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      I love and hate the idea of having a single ID on the internet, it’s interesting to think about.

        • s900mhz@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yeah federated login would be a very interesting concept and I’m sure we will get there. The constant online profiling and fingerprinting always makes me paranoid. A single login following me to multiple sites is basically a more forward fingerprint. But I’m hoping for a federated internet where tracking will be kept at a minimal because there is less incentive too.

  • mayooooo@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    For starters the fediverse is real and it works, the metaverse is peering into Zuckerbergs asshole