Amazing stuff.

  • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can explain. You’re thinking like a scientist, not a capitalist. Money will go into this tech because it forces you to be dependent on that charging system. They want that. It’s better margins than electricity creation.

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      You are not completely incorrect here, but the capitalist side of this entire industry shifted to obtaining the rights to the raw resources a long time ago. There’s a reason Tesla and Toyota have been snatching up mineral rights via acquisitions for years now. They want the entire supply chain, not just the proprietary means to deliver the product.

      • ch00f@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        But that’s the supply chain for the vehicles, not for the fuel. One of the best parts about BEVs is that if a new better technology is invented tomorrow, as long as it continues to use electrons being pushed around, all the infrastructure will continue to work. I don’t care what companies or governments try to do, I can still plug my car into the wall.

        There’s money in hoarding the lithium, but not the kind of printer ink/razor blade money that you have with fuel sales.