• Dave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      More broadly: an inability to discern good sources of information from bad sources of information.

      Same solution though: education.

      • nivenkos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, it’s shocking how many people still believe the lockdowns were a good idea despite so much evidence to the contrary in Sweden, etc. and now skyrocketing inflation and interest rates.

    • OrakMoya@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      People ignore education, grow up stupid. Stupid people vote stupid politiciants into office. Stupid politiciants cut funding to education. Worse education, people grow up stupider.

      Its a vicious cycle

    • AndreyAsimow@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Completely agree. General education from elementary school until the end of high-school feels outdated.

    • Mercival@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t think it’s as simple as that. Science is messy and knowing its limitations is just as important as knowing its conclusion.

      Scientific opinion can and should be able to change pretty rapidly, the educational system can’t.

      Besides, a cardiologist is highly unlikely to be able to reliably tell whether a neurological study’s conclusions are sound, or not. Let alone someone, who isn’t even a doctor.

      To top it all up, the monetary incentives in academia are about as corrupt, as it gets. It wasn’t so long ago, when studies about how smoking tobacco isn’t actually harmful, or addictive, got published in mainstream journals (funded by the tobacco industry, of course).

      The result is being taught science that was disproven 20 years ago. I think primary education should focus just as much on critical thinking as it does on learning facts at the very minimum.

      • fernfrost@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t mean cutting edge science. But a basic understanding of physics, mathematics, biology and chemistry.

        You can’t understand global warming without physics and mathematics.

        You can’t understand a pandemic without biology and mathematics.

        And so on