A good example is https://lemmy.world/c/documentaries

One of their mods, https://lemmy.world/u/sabbah, currently mods 54 communites despite only being on Lemmy for about a month and has never posted on c/documentaries (except for his post asking for people to join his mod team).

The other mod, https://lemmy.world/u/AradFort, has one post to c/documentaries and moderates 18 communities.

Does Lemmy.World have a plan to remove this kind of cancer before we start getting reddit supermods here too?

Edit: This comment shows how this is even more dangerous than I had thought.

Edit2: Official answer from LW admin is here

Final: Was going to create an issue for this on the Lemmy github, but I browsed for awhile and found that it had already been done. If anyone wants to continue the discussion there, here it is - https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/3452

Perhap we need another issue for the problem in the original edit (It being impossible currently to remove a ‘founding’ mod without destroying either the community of their account)

  • genoxidedev1@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    170
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I knew this would happen and that’s why I am FOR hardcoded community limits per user unless an admin, in individual cases, allows the user to open additional communities based on past handling of other communities the user has been (or was supposed to be) modding.

    Letting a user create 54 communities, especially those that were some of the biggest communities on Reddit is dangerous. Powermodding is a serious problem on online platforms and letting individual users create unlimited communities leads to it. Imagine how much money this person might want to sell their Account(s) for when the platform grows further and interest might accrue?

    It is humanely impossible to mod more than a handful of communities alone anyways. The users you mentioned are powermods.

    As another good example against freedom of creating unlimited communities is user LMAO whom most of you will probably at least have heard of by now, or even found when searching for a community that has numbers in its name.

    I will stand by this position.

      • genoxidedev1@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        1 year ago

        Should we just keep the door open with an advertising sign or should we at least take the advertising sign away?

        That’s not an argument not to introduce hardcoded limits, it is a problem for sure, but leaving them the opportunity without at least making it a bit of a hassle is just going to invite opportunity assholes.

      • James@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Admin owners can see IPs, which will grab most of the abusers who do this.

        There are other less direct techniques that major social media platforms use to identify users with multiple accounts even on separate IPs, which Lemmy will certainly need one day.

        For now though, simply using IPs is good enough until those more sophisticated algorithms are developed.

      • CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        They absolutely could. I don’t know if there’s a good technical solution to that. Maybe requiring IP registration or some other identity verification for mods over a certain number of communities.

        • Aux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Residential IPs change on a regular basis, you can’t do anything by IP.

          • James@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            They don’t change fast enough.

            You can’t ban by IP, but you can sure tell what accounts are owned by the same person or coming from the same network.

            It’s not perfect, but it’s another step that will catch many.

            • Aux@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              There are millions of people in the same network, lol. IP doesn’t tell you anything.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ok, I think you have a point. But where do you draw the line?

      IMO, it shouldn’t be a hard limit - that’s asking the dev team to deal with arguments on the topic indefinitely.

      I think per-instance limits make more sense in the short term, but that still just mitigates the reason not to do it, it doesn’t solve it.

      Ultimately, I think we should experiment with novel strategies, such as various democratic spins on moderation that decentralize authority. The fediverse is all about decentralization and trying stuff without missing out on the larger network after all.

      You seem passionate and you have a solid argument - you should post an issue on the GitHub. This shouldn’t be hard to actually implement - the majority of the work on this one is convincing everyone this should be done and what the rules should be

      • genoxidedev1@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree that a global hard-limit is problematic since every instance (admin) will want it to be how they see it, of course.

        A per-instance limit was what I had in mind (not originally, this point has come up before because of the user I mentioned in my last paragraph and someone convinced me; There also already is an issue regarding that or something similar as far as I remember and I gave my opinion on it in a reply).

        I think in that sense we both agree, it should be per-instance, and as you mentioned, the fediverse is all about decentralization, which is why I think something should be done about it.
        And I think unless we have further methods to maintain decentralized moderation, this hardlimit (per-instance) is the first step, or at least a step, in the necessary direction.
        Best case scenario, we’ll get other methods of maintaining decentralized moderation and get rid of the softlimit (?) later down the line.

        Of course democratic spins like subscribers voting mods every now and then would be an interesting solution (that opens up new problems, of course, but that comes with every solution).

        Hope my ADHD didn’t hurt the readability.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Haha no worries, I too think in webs, I found it pretty clear. Talking to other people with ADHD is so much more straightforward

          I’m convinced on your approach (at least until someone comes out with a more elegant way to handle it), I’m focusing on the client side for now, but if this is still an open issue in a month or two I’ll consider writing it myself. It’d be a good ticket to shake off the rust in Rust

          My thoughts on democratization go further than that - when Reddit made their disingenuous democracy pitch, I started to think what that would actually mean

          My thought is something like, everyone is invited to be a mod, or random members are asked to do an hour of mod work. They go through and do mod work, but everything requires corroboration

          In my approach, you’d have to look at every mod action, then decide if it defaults to action or inaction. Then you use some basic statistics to come up with numbers to pass or reject an action based on how many mod actions your community clears per Capita.

          I plan to look at it down the road…I don’t know nearly enough about modding to say I’ve got a fully formed approach, but I think there’s something there. I plan to ask some admins if I can do a short stint as a mod in order to better understand what it’s like, and then I want to look at this.

          I also have this idea of a “mitosis” operation to split a community when the mods feel it’s grown beyond them and they’re losing control… Fomo makes the idea controversial, but i generally find small communities better than large ones in every way. Maybe by pairing this with some version of the “multi” idea a lot of people are pushing we might find a happy middle ground

  • Izzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    156
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been trying to get an active mod to take over on the lemmy.world battlestations community, but despite my efforts posting in the lemmy.world support community which the admins have suggested doing for this exact issue there has been no change. https://lemmy.world/u/mandlar

    In general I find it pointless for there to exist a million empty communities even when the creators have good intentions. Most of them are sub communities of a broader category which only serves to unnecessarily split a community while there is barely traffic in the broader topic. You shouldn’t make a more specific topiced community unless the subject you want to discuss is getting burried in overwhelming traffic of the broader community.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      92
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      But there’s people out there who want to be “top mod” and do zero work. It’s like opening a lemonade stand but the only employee is a CEO that works from home.

      They think since a community on reddit existed with that name, all they have to do is make a Lemmy community with the same name.

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      One of the worst things about Reddit was that you could make a subreddit for anything but peeling away any amount of users from the “main” sub was next to impossible and forget about new user traffic without having the “default” name. Therefore the mods of that sub become the defacto admins of that topic on reddit until they piss off enough people to really get an alternative moving. Many different subreddits were actively fucked up by bad moderation but users kept dog piling in because it had the basic name you would think to search for, i.e. “television” or “videos” or “movies” or what have you. That name is real estate on reddit because no one else can have it, and that keeps horrible mods entrenched.

      I think we should encourage several hubs and stop worrying about “splitting” communities. We have the benefit here of letting different communities grow under the same name to avoid that situation where a shitty mod team gets unchallenged ownership. No one else could make a /r/sandiego, so they never shook that real estate free from its horrible mod. Here? That’s not an issue.

      For example, one of Lemmy.world’s biggest communities was locked by the head mod and forced to a different instance to join with another community. Without input from the lemmy.world users. It’s still sitting there in the communities list, locked, but high up on subscribers. Meanwhile the instance it was moved to is moderated much more strictly. Admins over there heavily “curate”; remove any post they don’t think are worthy enough to be posted.

      I think that community should be unlocked and a new moderator should be allowed to take over, so there’s a different version of that community on a different instance, then people can have a choice between what type of moderation they want to exist under.

      Edit: [email protected]

      Edit2: Reworded this mess for clarity

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        Pruning is an important step.

        It would be insane for admins to say that sub that lasted a month gets to just stay locked forever

      • tburkhol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Federation directly addresses this. If there’s a locked community, or a fake community on some instance, make another elsewhere. There will be some growing pains, but eventually people should migrate to the community that best suits their interests and attitudes. It’s messy and more work than just taking the big corporate sponsored option, but that’s the nature of organic communities.

        There was another thread recently asking, “Do I need to subscribe to [community] on all these different instances?” Sure, that’s a great way to find the ‘best’ one for you. Or just sub the biggest, or the one on the biggest instance, and hope for the best.

        • LeFantome@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I am not sure I understand. If I create a community on a different instance with the same name as a community somewhere else, how do those communities relate to each other?

          • Antik 👾@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            They don’t really but if you search for a community, let’s say “drumandbass” you will see all of those communities on all instances and subscribe to all of those. And if you don’t agree with how one is being run you can either help grow another one or star one on another instance from scratch.

      • WillfulBedder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is it the android community you’re referring to? As I believe that is run by the same moderators as was on the original subreddit, which is a shame.

        I don’t feel like transplanting the exact same leadership / moderator teams as was on Reddit is always the best idea and some element of choice is important.

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is no global authority to decide whether they are “allowed” or not. By design.

        • MahatmaGandhalf@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Bro we just got this space where no corporate overlords are dictating what we do. Can you not ask for corporate overlords to dictate what we do wtf is wrong with you?

    • Antik 👾@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 year ago

      Mandler has not been active in a month. If you want any of the communities make a post there, tag me and I will add you as a moderator.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Dude was on Lemmy for 1 day and snagged 8 different pokemon subs…

        He was really trying to catch them all

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Thanks!

            Now that I’m committed, I started looking around for inspiration to improve the community… and I’ve just realized that [email protected] exists and seems like it has effort being put into it, too. Womp, womp.

            I haven’t entirely decided where I stand on the whole “splitting communities is better/worse than having one canonical community for each topic” issue, but at the moment I’m at least leaning towards wanting to cooperate or complement, rather than compete. If anybody has advice about how to mod in such a way as to produce the best outcome for everybody interested in the topic instead of just trying to steal that community’s thunder, I’m all ears!

            (Alternatively, if folks want a place to talk about actual combustion instead of personal finance, I guess that option could be on the table too…)

            • laverabe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              fortunately the fediverse is much more liquid than reddit so no one really knows honestly what it will look like in a year. Right now it’s going through rapid change, and I think there will be a sort of equalization that will happen eventually.

              I was a mod early on in reddit’s creation and several subreddits used to group together and list each other each others sidebars to create an index of sorts. I think maybe having multiple communities across different servers, by the same name, but with different topics of interest could possibly serve to aid in more in depth discussions.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hey, I guess the admins removed u/sabbah from top mod of c/worldnews because they permabanned people for disagreeing with their personal opinions…

        Figured you might want to know the new mods added them back already because they think sabbah is good at “conflict resolution”

        https://lemmy.world/comment/1397441

    • AnonymousLlama@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The splitting the content comment is fair, I’ve seen heaps of random subreddits created when the main one still doesn’t have lots of content. Why fragment the experience, articles posted will now probably have less engagement and not be as exciting.

    • variants@possumpat.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe they just wanted to create the spaces and hoped to pass it on to someone who was interested but for now have the space where people could find, hopefully

  • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The LemmyAsk and LemmyExplain names are pretty clever. I hope those communities stick over the reddit-replacement communities like “AskLemmy”.

  • JshKlsn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mod a bunch. Only because I joined when Lemmy got it’s big first wave, and the site was literally dead. My contribution was making communities for people to start posting in, because a ton of people simply don’t want to moderate, or don’t know how to create communities.

    Within the first week I got a bunch of DMs from people asking to be mods, and I added all of them. I am not making communities to horde them. I am making them so people have places to post. To get the ball rolling.

  • TeaHands@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    There is a current initiative to get new mods for communities that are being used, but have inactive mods. Whether that covers any of these and what exactly the criteria are for “inactive”, I do not know.

    • SomeoneElse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mod 3 very small communities (less than 800 subscribers total) but other than creating the communities and posting some content to get the ball rolling I haven’t actually done any modding. I’m not sure what there is to do. No one has tagged or messaged me, no ones reported anything… am I inactive, redundant or just a terrible mod?!

      • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Just ban a random user each week to show you’re still active.

        You have enough users to make it at least 800 weeks!

      • Nawor3565@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lemmy is still small enough that you may just be getting lucky with everyone behaving themselves. If no one is reporting anything, just try to stay in-the-loop with the general goings on in the community so you can jump in if something does happen.

      • 567PrimeMover@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I run a small community of under 100 users. Everyone’s been following the rules so far, and there hasn’t been very much that has needed my attention. I still try to make an occasional post and interact with posts that other users make (favorite, boost, comment).

        I think that if you’re at least interacting with your communities in some way, you should be good!

        • SomeoneElse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I thought I was going to have to sticky a “friendly reminder; no transphobia” post earlier. It was touch and go but I think it came down on the right side of the discussion/argument divide.

          What was your report? Did you get ban-happy?!

  • fubo@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Currently the way communities work is a “homesteading” model: whoever gets there first gets complete control, unless the instance admin decides otherwise and takes it away.

    This is not the only way that things could work.

  • AsunasPersonalAsst@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Is this a phenomenon where power mods from Reddit are making these fallout shelters to establish their status quo here in case Reddit really dies?

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    The admins have started releasing some subs, but the world isn’t the limit of the fedeverse. If I was to start a new community, I probably wouldn’t host it here.

  • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fix this problem now before all the Reddit refugees decide that the new boss isn’t any better than the old boss.

  • InvaderDJ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    How would you stop this in a fair, repeatable way? Especially since alts are so easy to create.

    It makes me think this type of behavior is inevitable in any community where users can create their own subs. There might not be any easy way to deter this.