fossilesque@mander.xyz to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoPlease recommend your cheaper, reliable SSDs 2TB+ (4TB ideal)message-squaremessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up157arrow-down15file-text
arrow-up152arrow-down1message-squarePlease recommend your cheaper, reliable SSDs 2TB+ (4TB ideal)fossilesque@mander.xyz to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square49fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareFarraigePlaisteach@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 year agoI thought that SSD fails “better” than HDD because SDD become read-only first.
minus-squarePostcard64@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·edit-21 year agoOnly when they get to the end of life of the cells. If there’s another failure before that, it’s likely a full failure.
minus-squareFarraigePlaisteach@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoThanks. In that case is it known which of those two possibilities are most likely?
minus-squarecircuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoTo my knowledge, that isn’t a consistent pattern (someone please correct if wrong).
minus-squareFarraigePlaisteach@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoAccording to @postcard64 below I’m oversimplifying things (at minimum).
I thought that SSD fails “better” than HDD because SDD become read-only first.
Only when they get to the end of life of the cells. If there’s another failure before that, it’s likely a full failure.
Thanks. In that case is it known which of those two possibilities are most likely?
To my knowledge, that isn’t a consistent pattern (someone please correct if wrong).
According to @postcard64 below I’m oversimplifying things (at minimum).