nanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksM to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 7 months agoDev behind massive Skyrim multiplayer mod turns their hands to Starfield, gives up because "this game is f***ing trash," uploads everything for someone else to finishwww.gamesradar.comexternal-linkmessage-square105fedilinkarrow-up1766arrow-down132
arrow-up1734arrow-down1external-linkDev behind massive Skyrim multiplayer mod turns their hands to Starfield, gives up because "this game is f***ing trash," uploads everything for someone else to finishwww.gamesradar.comnanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksM to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square105fedilink
minus-square🇰 🔵 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-27 months agoExcept that Quake is a good engine. GameBryo is and has always been shit. There are other games from competent devs on that engine, and they also are full of problems. Building a house with a solid foundation is still important. Quake is bedrock. GameBryo is sand.
minus-squarePseudonaut@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·7 months agoWhy is everyone always saying GamBryo is shit? I hear this over and over again, but I never hear why.
minus-squareHossenfeffer@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months agoI think it’s because it was designed to be able to handle hundreds of persistent objects in a scene as a priority over graphical performance. That’s why Bethesda games have so much collectable junk - because they can.
Except that Quake is a good engine.
GameBryo is and has always been shit. There are other games from competent devs on that engine, and they also are full of problems.
Building a house with a solid foundation is still important. Quake is bedrock. GameBryo is sand.
Why is everyone always saying GamBryo is shit? I hear this over and over again, but I never hear why.
I think it’s because it was designed to be able to handle hundreds of persistent objects in a scene as a priority over graphical performance. That’s why Bethesda games have so much collectable junk - because they can.