I’ve had this box for almost ten years now, so I’ve been thinking about getting something new. Looking at the market, the new systems don’t seem to be all that much more advanced, though. So my question is, should I get a new one or just keep the old box and swap out the drives? What can a new NAS do that my old one can’t? And what kind of drives should I get? I have 2 TB WD Red something, is that still a good choice? I’d move up to 4 TB, of course. This box is only used as backup for my home stuff and a small business, I’m primarily concerned with reliability.

  • doeknius_gloek@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Why would you buy something new if your current solution works and your requirements don’t change? Just keep it.

    • Diplomjodler@feddit.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I’m concerned about those drives. While they’re not under a lot of load, every drive will fail eventually.

      • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m concerned about those drives. While they’re not under a lot of load, every drive will fail eventually.

        Go into your storage manager in DSM and check the drive health.

        You could always replace failing drives on the same NAS, but replacing the NAS just to replace it seems like a waste of money, unless your needs have changed.

        Provided that you have a backup solution (a NAS isn’t a backup solution on its own), then you should be covered even if the drive(s) fail.

        FWIW, I only use Seagate Ironwolf drives in my NAS.

          • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            I wouldn’t worry, then. You’ll typically have a some kind of warning when a drive begins to fail. Keep your backups regular, and replace drives when needed.

            I have my DSM set up to do a drive health check every month, and I’ll get an email with the results. Gives me piece of mind.

      • andy47@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Agreed, if the box works for you I’d look at cycling out the drives - 10 years is a long time for spinning disks to last and every day is another day closer to a failure.

        • Unaware7013@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          So just swap new drives in one at a time, after backing your data up just in case. I upgraded mine to 4x10 drives 3-4 years ago, and its painless as long as you wait for the resilvering process to complete.

      • doeknius_gloek@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Have you checked the SMART values of your drives? Do they give you a reason for your concerns?

        Anyhow, you should never be in a position where you need to worry about drive failure. If the data is important, back it up separatly. If it isn’t, well, don’t sweat it then.

  • code@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    I have a perfectly functional ds416 but its old too. I bought a newer model as my 416 mirrors data to it. Its a backup of my backup.

    The main reason i did it is support for future updates including security patches. The 416 doesnt autoipdate anymore i have to dl a seperate file and update. Im concerned how much longer it will get security patches. When it goes end of life i can easily make the newer box my main nas. Ill probably do it next year regardless.