• Neuromancer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think corporations should be limited to owning a small quantity of sfh. Maybe a dozen unless they can show a compelling reason such as housing for employees.

    Sfh are meant for families.

      • taladar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe put in a few exceptions for things like remote research or production facilities where no real town or civilization in general exists around them. Basically the kind where rotating worker shifts are stationed for 3-6 months at a time and then move back for a few months off.

    • TheDarkKnight@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just scale the tax, it’s so fucking easy to fix. But if they wait it’ll become a giant problem where some awful company or groups of company will fail and break the economy for a while etc etc.

      All you have to do is scale the tax. 1 house normal tax rate. 2 houses 2x tax rate on all properties. 3 houses 3x the tax rate on all properties.

      Numbers probably need adjusting but that keeps things reasonable, even for small landlords you can scale it so its fair and keeps properties local and even a good investment vehicle for individuals but prevent it from becoming an exploitive market by giants corps.

      • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Trump changed salt for personal taxes. Just make the rules cover corporations as well. I got fucked in salt