Toes♀@ani.social to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agoGlitch in the matrixani.socialimagemessage-square575fedilinkarrow-up1417arrow-down10
arrow-up1417arrow-down1imageGlitch in the matrixani.socialToes♀@ani.social to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agomessage-square575fedilink
minus-square💡𝚂𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗆𝖺𝗇 𝙰𝗉𝗉𝗌📱@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 months ago 2y, should take higher priority simply because it cannot be any further resolved or simplified Bingo! That is not the case with, say, 2(3+1) It’s the same thing, where y=3+1. 1/7y. Is the coefficient 7, or is it 1/7? i.e. Is that 1/(7y) Yes, it’s 1/(7y) as per the definition of Terms. Either way, if that’s not the the standard understood by everyone It’s the standard in literally every Maths textbook.
minus-squarekryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 months agoWhy the hell are you commenting on my 4 month old comments trying to argue. Fuck off.
minus-square💡𝚂𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗆𝖺𝗇 𝙰𝗉𝗉𝗌📱@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 months agoActually I’m educating and hoping people will stop arguing about it. You can take it on board or not. You actually nearly had it. Also, your comments will show up in search results for all eternity unless you delete them.
Bingo!
It’s the same thing, where y=3+1.
Yes, it’s 1/(7y) as per the definition of Terms.
It’s the standard in literally every Maths textbook.
Why the hell are you commenting on my 4 month old comments trying to argue. Fuck off.
Actually I’m educating and hoping people will stop arguing about it. You can take it on board or not. You actually nearly had it.
Also, your comments will show up in search results for all eternity unless you delete them.