This was originally posted to lemmy.pineapplemachine.com: https://lemmy.pineapplemachine.com/post/5781


Lemmy is federated and decentralized and that means that we can all coexist regardless of our differing political opinions. I think it’s important to preface this by saying that I am not offended by or concerned with anyone’s politics, and I’m certainly not here to argue with anyone about them.

My concern is that users are being banned and content is being removed on lemmy.ml citing a rule that is not publicly stated anywhere that I have seen.

Moderators of lemmy.ml are removing posts and comments which are critical of the Chinese government and are banning their authors.

This came to my attention because of how lemmy user bans are federated just like everything else, and I was confused about why my instance had logged a lemmy.ml user ban citing “orientalism” as the reason for the ban.

Screenshot of my own instance’s modlog, as viewed by an admin

I noticed that the banned user had recently commented on a post in [email protected] that had been removed with the reason “Orientalist article”.

Screenshot of banned user’s history on lemmy.ml

Screenshot of lemmy.ml modlog

Here’s the article that was removed, titled “China may face succession crisis”. It was published by axios.com, which mediabiasfactcheck describes as having “a slight to moderate liberal bias” and gives its second-highest ranking for factual reporting. The article writes unfavorably of Chinese President Xi Jinping.

https://www.axios.com/2023/06/06/china-may-face-succession-crisis

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/axios/

I had not remembered seeing anything in lemmy.ml’s rules that would suggest that “orientalism”—meaning, as I understand it, the depiction or discussion of Asian cultures by people in Western ones—was against the rules. So I checked, and I found that there was not. Not on the instance’s front page, and not in [email protected].

Screenshot of instance rules for lemmy.ml

Screenshot of community rules for [email protected]

There is a stated rule against xenophobia, but I think that xenophobia is not widely understood to include Westerners writing critically of the actions of an Asian government.

This is where I went from confused to concerned.

Lemmy instances have public moderation logs, which I think is a very positive thing about the platform. So I looked more closely at lemmy.ml’s moderation log.

Please note that moderation logs are also federated. It’s hard to be 100% sure which instance a mod action is actually associated with, looking at these logs. The previously mentioned user ban and post removal were, I think, definitely actions taken by lemmy.ml moderators. My own instance’s mod log identifies the banning moderator as a lemmy.ml admin, and the removed post was submitted to a lemmy.ml community. I’ve done my best to verify that all of the following removals were really done by lemmy.ml moderators, but I can’t be absolutely certain. Please forgive me if any of them were actually made on other instances that do have an explicitly stated rule against orientalism.

Removed Comment Ah yes. Being against China’s racist genocide is racist. China, the imperialist ethno-state, is clearly innocent. by @[email protected] reason: Orientalism

Screenshot of lemmy.ml modlog

Removed Comment Lol. Thinking some countries have better governments than others is supremacist? Whatever, dude. By the way. If there are any countries with decent governments, I don’t know of them. But like. If there were decent countries, they wouldn’t behave like China. by @[email protected] reason: Orientalism

Screenshot of lemmy.ml modlog

These following moderator actions did not specifically cite orientalism, but did not seem to be breaking any of the instance’s or community’s explicitly stated rules.

Banned @[email protected] reason: Only makes anti russia and anti china, crosspostst from reddit. 2nd temp ban expires: 9d ago

Screenshot of lemmy.ml modlog

Removed Comment Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia and Tibet are all Colonies of China, which it treats as Colonial Territories, by - Forcibly destroying the local culture. Forcefully extracting to harm of the locals. Genocide, abuse, kidnapping, rape. But there is no point in engaging to you. You are a liar. You know you are. When you deny genocides, you put yourself on the same side as the fascists and reactionaries of the past. by @[email protected] reason: Rule 1 and 2

Screenshot of lemmy.ml modlog

I have no affection for the Chinese government and I do not call myself a communist. I would not enforce a rule against orientalism on my own instance. But I think that lemmy.ml’s moderators are entitled to enforce whatever rules they please. It’s only that, as the largest single lemmy instance so far, I believe that they have an obligation to disclose these rules, and an obligation to not ban users or remove content for failing to follow unobvious and unstated rules.

I’d like to raise some awareness about this, and I’d like to openly ask the moderators of lemmy.ml to state the rules that they intend to enforce clearly and explicitly.

I will be very clear and state it again: I am not asking for anyone to change their opinions or to not enforce a rule that they believe in. That is the great thing about lemmy, that we can coexist in this federated community even when we don’t share the same opinions. What I am asking is for lemmy.ml’s rules to be clearly stated, because I think it does not reflect well on the broader community if the predominant instance moderates its users and content according to rules that are not being explicitly disclosed.

  • pineapple@lemmy.pineapplemachine.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you try to clearly state all rules, you will just end up with a huge wall of text that no-one reads other than some trolls that try to intentionally walk up right to the border of that is “legal” and test your patience as a moderator.

    There was a clearly stated reason for these removals, but it is a reason that does not appear either in lemmy.ml’s rules list nor on the page that you listed.

    There were additional moderator actions citing the same “orientalism” reason that occurred while I was writing the post:

    Screenshot of lemmy.ml modlog

    It is my opinion that this is a significant rule to leave unstated.

    • potate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree - and for better or worse, lemmy.ml is likely to be many users first experience with lemmy. As a new user myself, I subbed to a bunch of communities on lemmy.ml because it’s what I interpreted as being the ‘core’ of lemmy. Ambiguous rules - especially ones resulting in bans for discussing articles from high quality news sources - is problematic and likely to turn some people off. This is particularly an issue when lemmy is building towards critical mass.

      One of the principal complaints about reddit is power tripping mods - and it’s distressing to see that seemingly built into the DNA of lemmy.

      The flip side of course is that this has sort of opened my eyes to the power of lemmy and the fediverse.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      What about “Remarks that moderators find inappropriate” is not clear? :p

      • pineapple@lemmy.pineapplemachine.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        What about “Remarks that moderators find inappropriate” is not clear? :p

        Do you honestly have to ask? Most people will not interpret this as including orientalism.

        What is the purpose of having rules if you do not communicate to people the rules that they are expected to follow?

        • poVoq@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Look, I don’t agree with many things the Lemmy moderators do, but clearly they find “orientalism” inappropriate, so the rule clearly applies.

          • pineapple@lemmy.pineapplemachine.comOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            There’s no point in acting surprised about it. All the planning charts and demolition orders have been on display at your local planning department in Alpha Centauri for 50 of your Earth years, so you’ve had plenty of time to lodge any formal complaint and it’s far too late to start making a fuss about it now. … What do you mean you’ve never been to Alpha Centauri? Oh, for heaven’s sake, mankind, it’s only four light years away, you know. I’m sorry, but if you can’t be bothered to take an interest in local affairs, that’s your own lookout. Energize the demolition beams.

            • cavemeat@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              perfect response. Criticism of the Chinese government is not the same thing as orientalism.

              • Gray@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                1 year ago

                This seems to be a really common mistake some people make. Like when Pelosi tried to punish Ilhan Omar in the US House of Representatives for “antisemitism” when Ilhan was critical of the Israeli government. I can’t tell if these people genuinely can’t differentiate between racism and criticism of national governments or if this is a sinister misuse of racism to censor opinions they disagree with. My inclinations are towards the latter unfortunately.

                • cavemeat@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Given that many people who make this mistake are often not from the demographic that is presumably being harmed(meaning that it isn’t from a position of personal emotional harm), I’m inclined to believe that its an attempt to stifle the opponent by seemingly gaining the moral high ground.