• fearout@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Isn’t this, like, on purpose? Controversy and hate drive engagement, and since Elon “you’re a pedo cuck” Musk doesn’t give a shit about discussion quality or morality issues, it’s pretty obvious why he’s gone for that.

    I wonder what advertisers think though, and whether they’re ok with sharing their advertising budget this way. Just from a public image point of view alone it might be a problem for some, if not most large companies.

    • Whirlybird
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It doesn’t share anything about advertisers budgets?

      • fearout@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Their ads are going to appear in these discussions though, right? And it’s easy enough to screenshot. So I’d guess we’ll see a lot more of “hey BrandX, see, you’re sponsoring racism/sexism/genocide apology/etc.” discussions going forward.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yep, in sure those brands are thrilled that the money they give to Twitter goes to people like Andrew Tate.