0x4E4F@infosec.pub to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoSteve Balmer quotesinfosec.pubimagemessage-square256fedilinkarrow-up11.38Karrow-down137
arrow-up11.34Karrow-down1imageSteve Balmer quotesinfosec.pub0x4E4F@infosec.pub to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square256fedilink
minus-squareRoyaltyInTraining@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up78arrow-down1·1 year agoAnyone know how I can program Anarchism?
minus-squareThePhantomGM@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up99arrow-down2·1 year agoAllow all code merges automatically
minus-squareoce 🐆@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up27·1 year agoAnarchy is not absence of rules, it’s absence of hierarchy. So you could still collectively agree to certain rules for merges.
minus-squareaksdb@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoSo we could use a blockchain… (/s)
minus-squaremcmoor@bookwormstory.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·1 year agoBut then one person disagree with those rules and we’re back to no rules
minus-squarerottingleaf@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoWhich is not a collective agreement and not anarchism, if it imposes rules on those who voted against.
minus-squareoce 🐆@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoIs it not possible for the people to all agree to respect the result of the majority vote even if they voted against the motion?
minus-squareNorgur@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up55·1 year agoOpen a GitHub repo with a hello world script and accept each and every commit
minus-squareCowbee@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up26·1 year agoThe same way, generally. Work on decentralized, open source software. It’s modern Mutual Aid.
minus-squarePotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up26·1 year agowork on decentralized technology like lemmy
minus-squareSquare Singer@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up24arrow-down1·1 year agodd if=/dev/random of=anarchism bs=1024 count=1024;chmod 755 anarchism;./anarchism
minus-squaremalijaffri@feddit.chlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoHoly hell, I need to try this in a vm sometime!
minus-square0x4E4F@infosec.pubOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 year agoThe output is not valid, it won’t do anything… maybe write to a file “anarchism” in the dir in which the terminal was opened.
minus-squareSquare Singer@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoI think that emulates anarchism pretty well.
minus-square0x4E4F@infosec.pubOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·1 year agoWell, not exactly. Anarchism is pretty close to what Socialism is, in terms of distributing labour.
minus-squarecrispy_kilt@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoAnarchists are just people who think Stalinism is communism and haven’t read Marx yet
Anyone know how I can program Anarchism?
Allow all code merges automatically
Anarchy is not absence of rules, it’s absence of hierarchy. So you could still collectively agree to certain rules for merges.
Basicaly democracy on steroids
So we could use a blockchain… (/s)
But then one person disagree with those rules and we’re back to no rules
You can have a majority vote system.
Which is not a collective agreement and not anarchism, if it imposes rules on those who voted against.
Is it not possible for the people to all agree to respect the result of the majority vote even if they voted against the motion?
Which requires a consensus.
An initial one.
Open a GitHub repo with a hello world script and accept each and every commit
The same way, generally. Work on decentralized, open source software. It’s modern Mutual Aid.
work on decentralized technology like lemmy
dd if=/dev/random of=anarchism bs=1024 count=1024;chmod 755 anarchism;./anarchismHoly hell, I need to try this in a vm sometime!
The output is not valid, it won’t do anything… maybe write to a file “anarchism” in the dir in which the terminal was opened.
I think that emulates anarchism pretty well.
Well, not exactly. Anarchism is pretty close to what Socialism is, in terms of distributing labour.
Open a git repo.
Anarchists are just people who think Stalinism is communism and haven’t read Marx yet