• Blackbeard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not just that, but the ones for whom the freedoms enshrined in the Constitution are the beginning, middle, and end of their entire personal identity. They have a section of the Constitution tatooed on their fucking bodies, and they still support a man who would just as soon use the damned thing as toilet paper.

    • lingh0e@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If Trump can argue the technicality that he never specifically said “support”, we can argue ths technicality that the 2nd doesn’t specifically say “guns”.

      • TechyDad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        It says the right to “bear arms.” So if I want to graft a pair of cybernetically enhanced black bear arms to my body, I should have the right to do so! (As part of a well organized Bear Arm Militia, of course.)

    • TurboDiesel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Anyone who makes one thingTM their entire raison d’etre is always a little… let’s go with off for politeness. But the 2nd Amendment ones are just walking red flags.

    • Gork@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The Second Amendment is so awkwardly worded. You can tell it was initially drafted, then the middle part of the sentence (third line on that guy’s back) added in later.