• linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      IMO it’s the inverse, we don’t make enough. The 1% have been keeping wages stagnant. We can’t stop the price of goods from going up, but we can increase pay from it sharing the bottom line. As soon as interest rates re-appeared, all the free money that was sitting around for the taking disappeared. Sooner than later, we’ll be paying micro-transactions for crap that was previously able to be paid for by selling us ads. But that money isn’t coming back to us.

    • Patches@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it.

      • Upton Sinclair, 1934
    • BeautifulMind ♾️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Part of what’s happening on this front (things are expensive) is antitrust-related.

      Mergers and Acquisitions among competing companies, and ‘vertical integration’ along supply chains (both of which ought to get a lot more antitrust attention than they have for a long time) often means the resulting companies control supply enough that they can throttle supply and look, there’s not enough of the things! Prices then go up- and the loss in productive capacity that happens when competing firms consume each other is behind those mysterious ‘supply chain issues’ that led to empty shelves during the pandemic.

      The election wave immediately following Watergate swept a lot of then-young, centrist Democrats into the halls of congress- and in so doing, also retired the Democrats’ institutional interest in anti-monopoly enforcement. Since then, neglecting antitrust enforcement on boring things like commodities and pharmaceuticals has been a bipartisan affair.