• phorq@lemmy.ml
      75·
      11 months ago

      As an arch user, I’m confused… Doesn’t everyone use curl as their browser?

      • kpw@kbin.social
        38·
        11 months ago

        I recently switched to netcat, this lets me control the TCP stream more directly.

        • nixcamic@lemmy.world
          12·
          11 months ago

          In fact, what I use is Maté (an English way of writing the Spanish word Mate).

          As a Spanish speaker I’d just like to say

          A: wtf is this even supposed to mean?
          B: mate and maté are two entirely different words.
          C: The mate desktop environment is named after hierba mate, no é.

        • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
          4·
          11 months ago

          I generally do not connect to web sites from my own machine, aside from a few sites I have some special relationship with. I usually fetch web pages from other sites by sending mail to a program (see https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/womb/hacks.git) that fetches them, much like wget, and then mails them back to me. Then I look at them using a web browser, unless it is easy to see the text in the HTML page directly. I usually try lynx first, then a graphical browser if the page needs it.

          Fuck. What the hell.

          I occasionally also browse unrelated sites using IceCat via Tor. Except for rare cases, I do not identify myself to them. I think that plus Tor plus LibreJS is enough to prevent my browsing from being associated with me. IceCat blocks tracking tags and most fingerprinting methods.

          Ironically I think this makes his the most unique fingerprint in the whole internet.

      • lud@lemm.ee
        8·
        11 months ago

        Edge actually has a few nice features that chrome and Firefox miss.

        Like native horizontal tabs and tab groups (chrome might have groups)

        I still refuse to use it over Firefox though.

        • DrM@feddit.de
          3·
          11 months ago

          It lost a lot of the super-good touchscreen PDF functionality when it switched to chromium though, which I am still mad about. I hope at one point MS will return the PDF Viewer from the original edge

        • Klaymore@sh.itjust.works
          2·
          11 months ago

          Firefox has the (officially recommended) Simple Tab Groups addon and a couple different addons for horizontal tabs.

        • rambaroo@lemmy.world
          1·
          11 months ago

          Chrome does have tab groups, but I don’t find them super useful. Automatic grouping by domain would be nice for my usage since I only use chrome at work.

  • XEAL@lemm.ee
    411·
    11 months ago

    You install something that at the core is the same as you but with a better interface.

    It’s funny how Microsoft just gave up on creating a new web browser and instead just rebranded someone else’s homework.

  • Yerbouti@lemmy.ml
    271·
    11 months ago

    I’m amaze by how many people still use chrome based browser. They really want to get their face eat by a leopard. Well we told you people, there’s no reason left not to use firefox.

    • HappyToaster1911@lemmy.world
      62·
      11 months ago

      Chromium isn’t chrome, and there are reasons to use browsers not based on firefox, I like Vivaldi more than firefox way better customization and more features, but since Manifest V3 exists I am using firefox so I am already used to it if Google makes the other browsers shit

  • callyral [he/they]@pawb.socialEnglish
    282·
    11 months ago

    why do windows users install chrome?

    i don’t get it, edge comes preinstalled on windows and it’s chromium-based.

    • nicoweio@lemmy.world
      171·
      11 months ago

      Force of habit? Plus, if I used Windows, I wouldn’t use Edge out of spite. Fuck their shady ways of pushing users to use it.

      • RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml
        61·
        11 months ago

        it’s not even shady anymore. it’s just clingy and pathetic like an ex who can’t move on.

    • dansity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      5·
      11 months ago

      I used to get it why people install chrome. It had a specific look and feel. It’s no more, all browsers (except some startups making up the rules) look the same. Its a full page window with tabs on the top. Vanilla FF looks the same.

    • fossilesque@mander.xyzEnglish
      3·
      11 months ago

      The same reason people are reluctant to leave the Apple ecosystem, you’d have to set everything up again.

    • Sharp312@lemmy.one
      3·
      11 months ago

      Honestly i dont think most people do. We’re all in a bubble of atleast somewhat technically minded people, not just on lemmy but im sure most of our friends irl are similar. Ive been in a few officey type areas and out of the vast majority of monitors ive seen, theyve been using edge, sometimes i even see multiple browsers open lmao. Just checked statcounter and edge is the third most used which is fucking nuts when you consider how many options there are.

    • vinhill@feddit.de
      3·
      11 months ago

      I think lots of people also don’t know how easy it is to migrate all user data between browsers. Also, the added work of changing your phone app is probably too much for the average, comfortable consumer.

    • nixcamic@lemmy.world
      0·
      11 months ago

      If you’re gonna go though the trouble of installing a browser, why switch Microsoft for Google? They’re both evil and Edge actually performs significantly better than Chrome somehow (they’re basically the same I don’t get it).

      Install freaking Firefox.

      • callyral [he/they]@pawb.socialEnglish
        0·
        11 months ago

        If you’re gonna go though the trouble of installing a browser, why switch Microsoft for Google?

        Exactly I don’t get it, the only explanation I can think of is that they have Chrome on their phone and want to sync it or something?

        • Obi@sopuli.xyz
          1·
          11 months ago

          It’s just momentum. Chrome was THE advised browser for a long time and people are just used to it.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipEnglish
      7·
      11 months ago
      Set-ExecutionPolicy RemoteSigned -Scope CurrentUser # Optional: Needed to run a remote script the first time

irm get.scoop.sh | iex

      Microsoft doesn’t need to even be involved

    • odelik@lemmy.today
      6·
      11 months ago

      At least in win11.

      Not sure about win10, which didn’t have it installed by default orginally, but could be now? None of my win 10 machines are recent enough fresh installs to confirm, and have winget (and choco) installed because I installed it so I can install stuff easily.

      • rmuk@feddit.ukEnglish
        11·
        11 months ago

        On Windows 10 it was automatically installed as an update using - wait for it - the Microsoft Store.

        Yes, the system-wide package manager was distributed as a package in the desktop store. 🤌

    • puppy@lemmy.world
      171·
      11 months ago

      WinGet is an AppGet rip-off without even a mention of the original creator. I’m still salty about that.

    • slimarev92@lemmy.world
      62·
      11 months ago

      Yeah, but it’s mid at best. Many apps open a GUI installer even with winget. Also updates for many apps don’t work (if the app doesn’t save its version properly in the registry).

            • macniel@feddit.de
              7·
              11 months ago

              It downloads a package, it installs a package and then offers to remove that package. How is it not a package manager?

              • Synthead@lemmy.worldEnglish
                1·
                11 months ago

                A package typically includes the program and its data inside the package. It’s not just an install script. Imagine if Chrome’s MSI installer was simply a wrapper that also downloaded the browser. Imagine if there was a vulnerability with this, and it downloaded and installed something else. Since the package didn’t include the program files, it wouldn’t be able to tell if they were genuine. It only fetched the MSI, which was a download that initially passed the expected checksum (if it even does that).

                Additionally, file lists help ensure that programs and packages don’t conflict with one another. What if you wanted Chromium and Chrome at the same time. Can you do that? Simply wrapping an MSI doesn’t guarantee that. Perhaps there are conditionals in an installer that includes a vendored library under some circumstances, which would make them conflict.

                What about package removals? Some programs leave a bunch of junk behind in their uninstaller. Typically, since packages very often contain their own files, they simply delete their files when they’re being upgraded or removed. If a package manager puts full trust in an MSI to always be exactly correct, then it loses complete control over correctly managing file removals.

                I could go on and on, with more examples, but “run this binary installer” is the Wild West of putting software on your system. This is mostly the status quo on Windows, but this is a very poor standard. Other operating systems have solved this problem with proper packaging for decades.

                When building a package from sources, it makes sense to wrap installers, but then you produce a package that is typically distributed by a mirror. These packages would then by downloaded by you, and contain the source of truth that is trusted to be what it is and that it’ll do what it’s supposed to do without any doubts to consistency and security.

      • auf@lemmy.ml
        2·
        11 months ago

        Either the community on GitHub, or someone inside Microsoft.

        You can find their repository here (I think most people here are not interested in it tho lol)

        I have packaged some software for winget back when I was still using Windows, and yes it runs msi ( or exe ) silently under the hood. Installation processes that are usually done on GUI are automated just like how Homebrew does.

        • HW07@lemmy.world
          2·
          11 months ago

          I find that winget tends to just grab M$ Store packages, essentially becoming just an alternative CLI frontend.

          Chocolatey, however, actually grabs the native program. And it isn’t developed by Microsoft.

          Even Scoop is good enough, however programs might not work perfectly because it uses portable versions of the program.

        • HW07@lemmy.world
          1·
          11 months ago

          But some apps don’t function properly if not installed. So I think that chocolatey is better.

    • rtxn@lemmy.worldMEnglish
      81·
      11 months ago

      Fuck Winget. It’s a GUI-only person’s idea of what a CLI package manager should be. The only positive value I can think of is that it’s better than not having one at all.

      I manage about 500 Windows machines in a university. When teachers started complaining that they are unfamiliar with the paid version of an IDE, and we’d have to install the free community edition, I was delighted to learn that it was available through Winget. But privilege escalation on Windows is a fucking joke, so trying to install it remotely through Ansible/WinRM just popped the UAC anyway. I had to VNC into every single machine to click the fucking button. As an additional middle finger, winget.exe was not even in PATH when I tried WinRMing as the local admin.

      Winget is the absolute nadir of package managers, and it should be doused in acid, burned, chucked in the dumpster where it belongs, and forgotten. Choco and Scoop all the way.

    • quantenzitrone@feddit.de
      28·
      11 months ago

      i think it is very beneficial for the average user to have one of each common software category preinstalled

      as long as you can uninstall everything

      • idiomaddict@feddit.de
        9·
        11 months ago

        That’s the lemmy echo chamber. Poll a hundred people on how to get a program onto a computer without a browser and I’d be surprised if five people answered something other than a disk or that it’s impossible

        • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
          4·
          11 months ago

          other than a disk

          These days, they are probably not even going to answer with that. Optical media is almost dead now.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          3·
          11 months ago

          Even saying “with a package manager” it’s much easier to have a browser to make a search to know what you want to enter to install using the package manager!

          I’m sure many Linux users would be dead in the water if they were provided a computer with a distro without a browser/GUI package manager and no alternative way to access the internet.

      • Perfide@reddthat.com
        4·
        11 months ago

        Where the fuck would that be a popular opinion?

        Quick! You need to install a program, but you can’t remember the exact name of it. You have no browser installed nor a GUI package manager. What do you do?

        • Frozzie@lemmy.world
          1·
          11 months ago

          There is no situation where you need to install a package while having no Browser installed.

          My point is that you should install the browser you want, no have preinstalled programs you may not want or live without a browser.

          • Perfide@reddthat.com
            3·
            11 months ago

            Okay, how are you going to install a browser if you don’t know what to type? Sure, I know FF is Mozilla.Firefox, but not everyone does. And besides, I actually want Vivaldi(…only as an example) instead, which I don’t know the package name for. Without a pre-existing browser or external help, how am I supposed to install Vivaldi?

            I’m not disagreeing there should be options on OS setup, firefox being pre-installed with no input is barely better than Edge being pre-installed, but no browser at all by default is just stupid for most people. If we’re going with the idea of options on setup, the no browser at all option should exist, but only if it’s behind at least 1 but preferably 2 “Are you absolutely sure?” confirmation checks.

    • macniel@feddit.de
      2·
      11 months ago

      Mhm this reminds me of the time when we had in the EU a choice dialog after first boot where you had a selection of browsers to install from.

    • Pantherina@feddit.de
      2·
      11 months ago

      If a Distro preinstalls the Torbrowser it is based. Or maybe a Firefox that is actually debloated and hardened, not just having fancy bookmarks and a custom start page (looking at you Fedora)

    • HappyToaster1911@lemmy.world
      2·
      11 months ago

      That’s a pretty bad take, people into tech seem to mostly use firefox, people who aren’t probably don’t care, and for the people who know baout it and prefer another, can well, just uninstall it, so why not just have firefox so its simpler for everyone?? Like, on Manjaro and Garuda I could do well with that, but what if I use Ubuntu? The browser I like the most is Vivaldi, witch isn’t on the package manager, meaning that I need to download a browser to download another one instead of just using the one already in it to get it

    • QuazarOmega@lemy.lol
      1·
      11 months ago

      I think it’s fine if you give the option to uninstall it, many users wouldn’t know where to look to install the browser right away and they need access to the internet to find out (because they’re not familiar with the command line), they probably have a phone to look stuff up, but that’s bad user experience.
      Otherwise a first run welcome screen that asks the user which browser they want to install out of a selection (including none) can be a good solution

  • Pantherina@feddit.de
    93·
    11 months ago

    This meme makes no sense. Why would Windows want that?

    Surprisingly I dont get weird popups when installing Firefox