• SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s literally not noticable if you’re looking at it from a reasonable distance. I’m not talking about a cluster.

      • SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s funny how everyone pretends to give a fuck about environmentalism until they’re faced with the most minor of minor inconveniences.

        • eskimofry@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The conversation is actually about manufacturer greed (w.r.t sale prices going past $1000) and audacity to ask customers to pay that much for a less than perfect (their marketing material, theur words) device.

          • SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I hate greedy corporations as much as the next guy, but manufacturers are not going to up their QC to include single dead pixels and take a hit to their profit margin. They’d increase prices, by a lot.

            Maybe there’s a market for displays that meet this standard for the nitpickers, and sell the ones that fail at a discount, but they’d definitely be a premium.

        • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I like how you’re trying to tie manufacturers selling defective items at full price to environmentalism as if that makes the practice okay.