Literally just mainlining marketing material straight into whatever’s left of their rotting brains.

  • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    irrespective of what qualities of competence AI might actually have

    That competence mostly applies as a net negative when it’s being used in its present state because of who owns and who commands it. The “competence” isn’t thrilling or inspiring people that are getting denied medical because a computer program “accidentally” denied them healthcare, or when they experience increasingly sophisticated profiling and surveillance technology, or when people who previously paid bills with artistic talents get outbid by cheap-to-free treat printing technology.

    At a ground level among common people, outside of science fiction scenarios in their movies and shows and games, asking them to be particularly “curious” about such things when they’re only feeling downward pressure from them is condescending and I don’t blame some for being knee-jerk against it, or against those scolding them for not being enthusiastic enough.

    I 100% agree that the ownership of these models is what we should be concerned with, and I think dismissing the models as dumb parlor tricks undercuts the dire necessity to seize these for public use. What concerns me with these conversations is that people leave them thinking the entire topic of AI is unworthy of serious consideration, and I think that’s hubris.

    That was not my position, though I do on the side mock the singularity cultists and false claims about how close the robot god’s construction is, and I also condemn reductionist derision of living human beings with edgy techbro terminology like “meat computers” while trying to boost their favorite LLM products.

    • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      No disagreement with anything you just said, apologies for misinterpreting your position.

      I don’t know how to reconcile the manic singularity cultists with what I feel is a very real acceleration toward a hellscape of underemployment and hyper capitalism driven by AI. It does feel to me like the urgency AI represents deserves anxious attention, and I at least appreciate the weight those cultists place on that technology I think represents a threat. It feels like people are only either eagerly waiting for a sentient AGI, or mocking AI on those terms of sentience, leaving precious few who are actually materially concerned with what threats AI represent. And that is not at all a way of dismissing the very real ways machine learning is deployed against real people today, but I think there’s a lot of room for it to get worse and I wish people took that possibility seriously.

      • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No arguments from me here.

        It’s especially frustrating because there are very real threats from the technology as it is being applied and commanded, but because the ruling class has so many tech billionaires among them, their version of perceived threats gets the attention and publicity, usually some pop culture shit about robot uprisings (against them specifically).

        • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          but because the ruling class has so many tech billionaires among them, their version of perceived threats gets the attention and publicity, usually some pop culture shit about robot uprisings (against them specifically)

          Yes, i’ve been struggling articulating how I feel about this saga, and I think this captures it. Because while i felt a little encouraged seeing people advocate for legislative action, the action and concerns they were articulating were just, off. There were very brief mentions of concerns about unemployment, but then they passed over them like it was too big a problem to talk about. My hair especially raises when I hear the conversation veer toward copyright infringement.

          Thanks for discussing this with me, I feel a bit better

          • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            I appreciate the clarification of your position, too.

            It fucking sucks that actual valid concerns about LLMs and related technology are likely to continue to be ignored in favor of WHAT IF ROBOT UPRISING LIKE IN THE TREATS sensationalism and what regulations might actually come will likely be regulatory capture tactics done by the ruling class and their lobbying power. doomer