• Octavio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think there will be much damage. It’s not as though this were some huge surprise. The only people left on X agree with him or don’t care enough to mildly adjust their habits. I saw that IBM “paused” their ads, but I’d bet a nickel they will resume them once this blows over. They know what Xitter is. All the corporations know and don’t care. This very article on the NYT website has a button to share it on Twitter.

    • YⓄ乙
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      So true. I think in general human beings dont really care as long as it doesn’t affect them personally.

    • jabjoe@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not true. Lots of are still there because lots are still there. You see they tried to move to Mastadon, but obviously were confused. They leave like three accounts on three different instances with a few posts about being confused or not getting on with Mastadon.

      They aren’t nazies, they just don’t feel they can move.

      • TheKingBee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        “If 10 people are sitting at a table being civil to 1 nazi, there are 11 nazis at the table.”

        • jabjoe@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          They aren’t being civil to the Nazi. They aren’t conceding the table. They are furious at him for messing up the table.

          • User_4272894@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            This metaphor falls down when you realize the table is in a restaurant owned by a Nazi, and the table by the window makes the restaurant look really popular.

            Refusing to concede the table is literally adding value to the Nazi owned table, and giving others cover to say “no we also hate Nazis; we’re just here because that table looks cool” which furthers the problem.

            • jabjoe@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              They are there because they were there before the Nazi bought the restaurant.

              I want them to leave to, and come to Mastadon and Lemmy, but they don’t see able to. I don’t think of them as Nazies because of it. They argue with the Nazies. They are just ignorant and not IT literate enough to move. Though I think there is wide acceptance that it’s getting more and more toxic there.

              • User_4272894@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Oh, shit, well as long as they got to the restaurant before the Nazi bought it, I guess there’s no harm in continuing to support it. Especially if they don’t have the technical knowledge to… Stop using a website?

                • jabjoe@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Not sure you can say the are supporting it. They can’t use the other restaurants and can’t cook. There is probably a certain amount of denial they are dealing will full-on Nazies. Hard to see something when doing so means you have to act in a way very detrimental to your life.

                  • User_4272894@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    For a service like Twitter, where user numbers define value, using it is 100% supporting it. Again, the metaphor falls apart because suggesting they can’t use other options suggests they might die, which is painfully untrue for the vast majority of Twitter users (literally no user in a developed country relies on Twitter for life/death information in a way other sources can’t provide).

        • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s just a rubbish oneliner to make people think they’re smart. It’s the first time I stumble upon it, but its up there with “Live Laugh Love”, “never say never” and “you only live once”…

            • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I’d have a civilised discussion with everyone, especially irl, even if they’d killed my brother, and not reject them before a conversation just based on their beliefs or actions… I may well reject them for not being able to discuss or argue, but dialogue is always the way to approach a dispute

            • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I never do. It sounds like you regularly intentionally misinterpreted what people say, to either make fun, bully or boost your own ideas.

              I do not approve of Nazis, but I think talking to them and discussing with them is the best we can do to convince them of what they’re doing wrong.