• EatYouWell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just because the article is about a tech company owner doesn’t mean it’s related to technology.

    Musk being a shitty person isn’t technology related.

      • EatYouWell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, it really isn’t. A social media company’s income is business or financial related, not technology.

      • sfgifz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Does that mean any business that has a web platform or an app is valid content for this sub?

        • MsPenguinette@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Twitter doesn’t just have a web platform, it is a web platform and used to be one of the largest. But I’d say that yeah, tech companies fall into my personal idea of what this sub is

      • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        So where is the “technology” in that? Just because it’s a social media company? There’s dozens of those now, so what? A company implementing a new API or front end website redesign or new service that uses technology is technology. Not this. This is just general shit. The Internet boom was in the 90s. You may have had a point back then when this stuff was actually new.

      • tiredofsametab@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        A lot of people will upvote anything on a list without even looking at the community or considering the relevance of the post to that community (/all, /subs, /new, etc.)

          • EatYouWell@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean, women and non-whites vote republican, so I don’t put a ton of stock into what the numbers say. I’m sure Florida or Texas could pass a vote re-establishing slavery, but that doesn’t mean the people are right.

            Just because an article involves a tech company doesn’t mean it’s about technology. Twitter losing ad revenue because it’s owner is a nazi is not about technology; it’s about marketing, finance, and politics.

            It would be nice if this community didn’t devolve into a Musk news feed like it did on Reddit.

            • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Just because an article is about a tech company doesn’t mean it’s about technology. Correct.

              This community is called “technology”. Also correct.

              But people can post what they want and upvote what they want. So if this is what they want, then they aren’t wrong. Look at “trees”. Not a single damn tree in the whole place.

              I really do recommend starting a community called techWithoutMusk and moderating it how you like. I’m sure a bunch of people would join. Or become a mod here, and change what people can vote on.

      • JimboDHimbo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        And you are salty af.

        E: Y’all don’t like the occasional username joke? 😂