• Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What’s really wild is that people arguing for things like Right-to-Repair would be anywhere near right-wing to begin with.

    Like, Louis, you don’t see how the entire conservative ideology undermines ideas like right-to-repair? How can you be like “Yeah, I trust these guys who all would shut down the things I’m arguing for,” and just be oblivious to it?

    • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      the entire conservative ideology undermines ideas like right-to-repair

      Louis’s videos are posted to multiple platforms out of principle, not politics… that means they also get posted on sites with creators that have been kicked out of YouTube, like the one linked here

      • steakmeout@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        A person of principle wouldn’t post there. Simple. It walks, quacks and shits like a duck.

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        My principle is I don’t hang out in fucking Nazi spaces.

        Like, I wouldn’t go to a bar that advertised itself as a Nazi bar, and I wouldn’t upload my content to a site like this, that has enough Nazis on it that they’re in the recommended videos for a fucking Louis Rossman video.

        If Louis is happy hanging out at Nazi bars, that’s on him and you can hardly hang that on “principles.”

    • Eheran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Repairing things used to be normal. From that point of view, conservatism is perfectly right.

      I doubt he is right wing, given what he says and does.

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Repairing things used to be normal. From that point of view, conservatism is perfectly right.

        Conservatism has only ever existed to keep an aristocracy. Look at history, it’s literally why it developed as an ideology, because a lot of the aristocracy from Europe didn’t actually want the aristocracy to end, so they needed to make up political positions that supported the idea that there should be an untouchable elite to whom laws don’t apply.

        It has literally never, ever existed to “conserve” anything like natural resources or the rights of individuals. At it’s core it was about retaining Kings, Queens, Dukes, and Lords without actually keeping those, but instead making it about wealth.

        So yeah, gonna hard disagree on that. Conservatism is the source making laws that deny you the ability to repair, the conservatives aren’t the ones out here fighting for it.

        • Eheran@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          People get old, they do not want this to change. That is where it comes from. Regardless of the persons status. It is also irrelevant where it comes from.

        • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think I just realised that the term “conservative” is just a lie. Just like “pro-life” or whatever other BS they come up with, it’s just a smokescreen to cover their real agenda, which is to dominate others.

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Dude sounds a lot like a libertarian business owner tbh. I wouldn’t be surprised if they align very well with the right otherwise.

      • MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        he has some very dubious takes - he’s very correct on how shitty it is to be a consumer but he’s completely blind to any systemic analysis of it, willfully I would imagine.

      • shirro
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Platforms that offer greater freedom also tend to host visibly more extreme content. My guess is the slightly more advertiser friendly extremism pushed by algorithms on mainstream platforms is far more impactful on society.

        Outside of the relatively small number of people engaged with issues like software freedom, privacy, right to repair there is no reason to choose a platform with less views unless your content is banned from the alternatives.

        I expect Rossmann’s politics are shaped by his experiences as a small business owner. Many such people desire greater economic and individual freedom and are likely economic liberals but that doesn’t necessarily influence their views on other matters. He is an outspoken advocate for consumer freedoms including right to repair which I respect. I don’t know the guy personally but I would be surprised and disappointed if he endorses far right crazy shit. I am using Lemmy and respect the people who wrote the software but nothing about my politics should be inferred from theirs.

    • neo (he/him)@lemmy.comfysnug.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Here’s the conservative angle, at least in my view: “We’ve always had the right to repair our possessions before, and we will conserve that right for future generations.”

      Then again, what I consider conservative has never actually matched up with the political party, which is a big part of why I am no longer right wing.