• banneryear1868@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They already own their home and are enjoying life.

      -by exploiting other’s labor and creating a bigger wealth disparity than has ever existed

        • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not the amount of money it’s the method of acquisition. An engineer or independent contractor or something could make that kind of money and still not be considered bourgeoisie. (Though probably petit-bourgeoisie?)

          • Urist@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            (Though probably petit-bourgeoisie?)

            Still a prole until you stop relying on selling your labour power for money. Though an outlier statistically.

              • Urist@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                It did make me think of examples where there are edge cases though. Say a freelancer or an artist that, although they do not directly employ people, their income from their work could be greatly multiplied by the work done by others. In the end it might just boil down to details whether such an arrangement is or is not petit bourgeoisie.

      • banneryear1868@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The meme’s not really about the car it’s about the ideology of the person in it and how common that “consoom your way to freedom” view is among certain males in particular. Cars are whatever and sometimes amazing machines, like yeah maybe people shouldn’t be able to buy million dollar vehicles while other people starve, but that goes way beyond a car and more like the whole structure of capitalist economy.

        • eric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          lol that’s a hellofalot of projection, but whatever helps you cope, bud.

        • Unaware7013@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          You only need to be in the top 5-10% of earners in the US to start to afford the cheaper super cars.

          I’m pretty sure you just don’t like the idea that middle class individuals can afford supercars

          Which is it? Can I be middle class and afford a supercar, or do I need to be upper class (being in the top 10% of earners) to be able to afford one? Because I’d love to hear an argument that “middle class” and “top 10%” are remotely the same that didn’t make me laugh in your face.