Hate them for shooting lenin, it was directly instrumental to their death. But the “anarchist” who did that were allied with mostly russian nationalists.
Not that much, he was mildly sympathetic to anarchists (closer to lenin, than stalin/trotsky). He was temperating influence i feel, so collectivization may have gone smoother with him being more influential. I have kinda confusing feelings on him, as his theoretical work at first was bleh, but his economic outlook/general aims were more humane
But ussr should have allowed internal factionalism after nep and/or after ww2
Na, should have gone full Stalin until now.
wasn’t Bukharin a W tho
Hate them for shooting lenin, it was directly instrumental to their death. But the “anarchist” who did that were allied with mostly russian nationalists.
Not that much, he was mildly sympathetic to anarchists (closer to lenin, than stalin/trotsky). He was temperating influence i feel, so collectivization may have gone smoother with him being more influential. I have kinda confusing feelings on him, as his theoretical work at first was bleh, but his economic outlook/general aims were more humane