iridaniotter [she/her]@hexbear.net to the_dunk_tank@hexbear.netEnglish · edit-21 year ago[CW: bestiality] Professional "moral philosopher" ponders whether it's OK to sexually assault animals, featuring AI artlockNSFWhexbear.netimagemessage-square214fedilinkarrow-up172arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up172arrow-down1image[CW: bestiality] Professional "moral philosopher" ponders whether it's OK to sexually assault animals, featuring AI artlockNSFWhexbear.netiridaniotter [she/her]@hexbear.net to the_dunk_tank@hexbear.netEnglish · edit-21 year agomessage-square214fedilinkfile-text
https://nitter.net/PeterSinger/status/1722440246972018857 No, the art does not depict bestiality, don’t worry.
minus-square7bicycles [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 year agoI agree here honestly. There’s good reasons to not fuck animals, mainly that that they can’t consent. However that is absolutely not as to why it’s a taboo. Should be though.
![[CW: bestiality] Professional "moral philosopher" ponders whether it's OK to sexually assault animals, featuring AI art](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/f26b2dce-7254-4537-acd1-5de623b591e0.png){kind=link}
I agree here honestly. There’s good reasons to not fuck animals, mainly that that they can’t consent.
However that is absolutely not as to why it’s a taboo. Should be though.