iridaniotter [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net to the_dunk_tank@hexbear.netEnglish · edit-210 months ago[CW: bestiality] Professional "moral philosopher" ponders whether it's OK to sexually assault animals, featuring AI artlockNSFWhexbear.netimagemessage-square214fedilinkarrow-up172arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up172arrow-down1image[CW: bestiality] Professional "moral philosopher" ponders whether it's OK to sexually assault animals, featuring AI artlockNSFWhexbear.netiridaniotter [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net to the_dunk_tank@hexbear.netEnglish · edit-210 months agomessage-square214fedilinkfile-text
https://nitter.net/PeterSinger/status/1722440246972018857 No, the art does not depict bestiality, don’t worry.
minus-squareDolores [love/loves]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·10 months agoi think it’s a long way from leg-hump (which isn’t sexual in all situations, it’s often about dominance) to fucking an animal with incompatible morphology, wrong pheromones, and incorrect behavior
![[CW: bestiality] Professional "moral philosopher" ponders whether it's OK to sexually assault animals, featuring AI art](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/f26b2dce-7254-4537-acd1-5de623b591e0.png){kind=link}
i think it’s a long way from leg-hump (which isn’t sexual in all situations, it’s often about dominance) to fucking an animal with incompatible morphology, wrong pheromones, and incorrect behavior