• frickineh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    We had several Moms for Liberty-ish candidates in all of the nearby districts and I think they were mostly all defeated pretty soundly, so that was nice. I guess the one good thing these assholes have done is get a lot more people to pay attention to school board elections, even if it’s just to stop them from slithering in with their alt-right bullshit.

  • 8bitguy@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    “They don’t want to engage in this banning of books or censoring of honest history or undermining who kids are,” Randi Weingarten, the teachers union president told The Associated Press on Wednesday, characterizing the candidates who won as “pro-public school.”

    It’s sad that we’ve gotten to a point where this has to be a fight.

    • snorkbubs@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Is there any reasonable stance a person could hold, where teachers unions would be a “frequent foe”?

      Imagine always knowing better than teachers, doctors, historians, fact checkers, other parents, and virtually any expert or intellectual. I can’t even wrap my head around that level of ego. The mind boggles.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Easy explanation! They aren’t comparing brain pans with those people, they’re saying those ‘experts’ have an agenda and they’re smart enough to see through it.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I suspect future historians (if we survive as a species) will think of this time as another Dark Ages.

  • jballs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The American Federation of Teachers said candidates publicly endorsed by conservative groups such as Moms for Liberty and the 1776 Project lost about 70% of their races nationally in elections this week — a tally those groups dispute.

    The 1776 Project said 58% of the candidates they endorsed — many of them in conservative areas — won. Moms for Liberty, which works in largely suburban swing districts, said 40% of its endorsed candidates won.

    Wtf kind of jankity-ass reporting is that? Person A says it’s raining, Person B says it’s not. Stick your fucking head out the window, find out the truth, and report that!

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Its hundreds/thousands of races across the country, all of them local seats.

      It is entirely likely that there is not complete public reporting of all the races yet, so they are relying on 3rd party info as it “should” be more accurate due to direct knowledge of outcomes.

      • jballs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I see your point, but they’re not even relying on 3rd party data. They’re relying on 3rd party press releases. At the bare minimum, AP should have asked for the data behind each of those claims and cross referenced them against each other. Otherwise what value is this “journalism” adding here? I can go read a Mom’s for Liberty press release if I wanted to hear unfact-checked bullshit.

        • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I agree overall, and if I’m being cynical, media likes to portray a “fight” between different groups, that some conflict exists, even when there isnt any.

          Instead of reporting the literal facts, they often write a narrative of battling groups, which is bolstered by differing statistics.

          This undoubtedly gets way more clicks then otherwise, but once you start looking for it it’s everywhere.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    “They don’t want to engage in this banning of books or censoring of honest history or undermining who kids are,” Randi Weingarten, the teachers union president told The Associated Press on Wednesday, characterizing the candidates who won as “pro-public school.”

    Tina Descovich, a Moms for Liberty founder, said Tuesday’s elections brought the number of its candidates who have won races in the past two years to 365.

    “We have to work harder and we have to figure out how to invest in our candidates,” Descovich said, noting that teachers unions — a frequent foe — have decades-old political operations.

    School boards, usually nonpartisan, deal with the nitty-gritty of running a key community institution that decides curriculum standards and discipline policies for students, negotiates contracts with teachers unions and sets property tax rates for homeowners.

    A conservative board in that county was one of the first to enact Youngkin’s reforms, and the superintendent hired by that district pulled 13 books from library shelves, including “Beloved” by Nobel laureate Toni Morrison and “The Perks of Being a Wallflower” by Stephen Chbosky.

    “I think that that is a rejection of these policies and beliefs that public schools are bad,” said Brittania Morey, who won reelection to the Linn-Mar board with the support of those who oppose Moms for Liberty-endorsed candidates.


    The original article contains 1,068 words, the summary contains 217 words. Saved 80%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!