• squeakycat@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’ve been completely dropping the ball for years. I used to donate regularly but have completely given up on this project. It’s a farce at this point.

      Thankfully I only have simple needs so Krita suffices and I don’t have to deal with the never-improving UX nightmare and never-releasing changes.

      Yeah, I’m salty. It’s just that GIMP was a shining star of FOSS and it’s just been slowly rotting from inaction.

      • wiki_me@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        They’ve been completely dropping the ball for years. I used to donate regularly but have completely given up on this project. It’s a farce at this point.

        Liberapay shows the number of donors has almost doubled in the last few months (look at “view income history”), so i hope it is an indication that they made good changes to the project management and the future will be better.

    • Spectacle8011@lemmy.comfysnug.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      The reasons are made clear on their roadmap.

      The GTK3 port is done, and now they need to finalize the new extension API and improve their color space support (particularly CMYK). It would be nice if Wayland had a color management protocol extension standardized by then, but I don’t think it’s a blocker.

      • KISSmyOS@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’ve switched to Gimp 2.99 with GTK3 from Debian Experimental.
        Seems stable and bug-free (if a little sluggish) so far.

        Edit: Just checked their site. Quote from the release notes of the first 2.99.x release:

        The vast majority of the work has already been done. What remains now is the final stroll.

        That was 3 years ago.

  • Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Some harsh comments about GIMP here. I think it’s fantastic. Totally bailed out my workplace when the Adobe Extortion Suite decided break on our machines. I use it at home too and I’m grateful for it.

  • warmaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    While not the same, Krita, Inkscape and Kdenlive are so far ahead in terms of UX/UI that at this point I won’t ever see a redesign of GIMP.

    It’s a shame since it is really powerful, but the UX/UI is holding it back so much.

  • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    when single devs can reproduce almost every aspect of Photoshop’s UX, performance, and featureset in projects like photopea.com, I have to have major doubts about whether the GIMP team are doing the right thing by spending years to update the GTK version instead of just rewriting everything from the ground up.

    The straw that broke the camel’s back for me was the “3.0 is this year we promise!” post months ago which is increasingly looking like it wasn’t all to be.

    Chuck out the technical debt, use a modern language, and build a functional successor without the 90’s baggage. That’s my hot take.

  • superfes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    My favorite part about GIMP is that after the thousands and thousands of hours people have spent developing it, it still can’t compete with software from the 1990s, that is to say, it’s complete shit, they should start from scratch at this point, perhaps aiming low like competing against 1990s MS Paint.

    There’s no way they could compete with MS Paint today >_>

    • RedSeries@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      L take. I agree it’s behind modern image manipulation software, but it does almost everything that Photoshop did in the early 2010’s at least. It’s considerably better than current-day paint.

      • wizzor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I use gimp daily, but it is still far, far behind photoshop from when I was studying and that was pre 2010.

        The biggest problem is the UI. The only major improvement was the transition from multi window to single window with tabs, around 2012 or so.

        It feels like using a hammer with a purple dildo for a handle. I can do it after 10 years of getting the hang of swinging around the wobbly thing. Meanwile the rest of the world transitioned to battery driven nailguns and I’m still swinging my dilmer with a slightly more rigid handle.

    • jelloeater - Ops Mgr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, it’s painful to use. Like I want to like it, but Photoshop is just a superior product. Just look at what tools professionals use when time is money.