Officials are trying to understand why consumer spending, the job market and overall growth have not responded to the most aggressive interest rates in decades.

  • gloriousspearfish@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Another option to decrease spending is to increase taxes. That would of cause target the rich more, whereas increasing the interest rates is usually a benefit for the rich and hurts everyone else.

    No wonder why increasing taxes instead of interest rates are never discussed to tackle inflation.

    • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s also vastly easier for the Fed to adjust interest rates than for Congress to adjust taxes.

      Hell, it took them weeks to elect a speaker, could you imagine a debate over taxes!

      • rifugee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        it took them weeks to elect a speaker

        And the best they could come up with is Mike fucking Johnson.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That would of cause target the rich more

      Though we should definitely raise taxes on the top 3 quintiles for a wide variety of reasons, your statement here is specifically why raising taxes to fight inflation doesn’t really work.

      The vast majority of consumer spending is non-discretionary